Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul 28:8:882.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00882. eCollection 2020.

Cell Reprogramming With CRISPR/Cas9 Based Transcriptional Regulation Systems

Affiliations
Review

Cell Reprogramming With CRISPR/Cas9 Based Transcriptional Regulation Systems

Ksenia M Shakirova et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

The speed of reprogramming technologies evolution is rising dramatically in modern science. Both the scientific community and health workers depend on such developments due to the lack of safe autogenic cells and tissues for regenerative medicine, genome editing tools and reliable screening techniques. To perform experiments efficiently and to propel the fundamental science it is important to keep up with novel modifications and techniques that are being discovered almost weekly. One of them is CRISPR/Cas9 based genome and transcriptome editing. The aim of this article is to summarize currently existing CRISPR/Cas9 applications for cell reprogramming, mainly, to compare them with other non-CRISPR approaches and to highlight future perspectives and opportunities.

Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9; dCas9; genome screening; human cell reprogramming; regenerative medicine; transactivator systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
CRISPR/Cas9-based systems. (A) Classical CRISPR/Cas9 system, where sgRNA guided Cas9 performs a double-strand break in target locus. In order to manipulate gene expression the dCas9 mutant without nucleolytic activity was created. First generation CRISPR/dCas9 systems consist of two components: dCas9 fused with effector and sgRNA. They include (B) chimeric dCas9, which can physically block RNA polymerase and repress elongation or, if fused with effectors, activate or repress gene expression; and (C) VPR, where three activator domains VP64, p65, Rta are fused with dCas9.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Second generation CRISPR/dCas9 systems, which activation or repression is amplified due to recruiting multiple copies of an effector by RNA. (A) Scaffold and (B) Casilio systems use RNA regions [aptamers in Scaffold and PUF-binding site (PBS) in Casilio] for simultaneous recruitment of different effectors to different sgRNAs by RNA binding proteins (RPB in Scaffold and PUF in Casilio). (C) in SAM RNA binding protein MS2 is fused with two activator domains, p65 and HSF1, and dCas9 is also fused with activator VP64.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Second generation CRISPR/dCas9 system SunTag, in which multiple copies of GCN4 recruit multiple molecules of the chimeric scFv antibody-activator protein to the target site.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Second generation CRISPR/dCas9 system TREE, which is a combination of Scaffold and SunTag, where (GCN4)n tail binds with RNA aptamer by MS2 RNA binding protein.

References

    1. Acosta-Alvear D., Cho M. Y., Wild T., Buchholz T. J., Lerner A. G., Simakova O., et al. (2015). Paradoxical resistance of multiple myeloma to proteasome inhibitors by decreased levels of 19S proteasomal subunits. eLife 4:e08153. 10.7554/elife.08153 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adamson B., Norman T. M., Jost M., Cho M. Y., Nuñez J. K., Chen Y., et al. (2016). A Multiplexed Single-Cell CRISPR screening platform enables systematic dissection of the unfolded protein response. Cell 167 1867.e21–1882.e21. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.048 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alic N., Ayoub N., Landrieux E., Favry E., Baudouin-Cornu P., Riva M., et al. (2007). Selectivity and proofreading both contribute significantly to the fidelity of RNA polymerase III transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 10400–10405. 10.1073/pnas.0704116104 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amabile A., Migliara A., Capasso P., Biffi M., Cittaro D., Naldini L., et al. (2016). Inheritable silencing of endogenous genes by hit-and-run targeted epigenetic editing. Cell 167 219.e14–232.e14. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arinobu Y., Mizuno S., Chong Y., Shigematsu H., Iino T., Iwasaki H., et al. (2007). Reciprocal activation of GATA-1 and PU.1 marks initial specification of hematopoietic stem cells into myeloerythroid and myelolymphoid lineages. Cell Stem Cell 1 416–427. 10.1016/j.stem.2007.07.004 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources