Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 4:7:423.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00423. eCollection 2020.

Pharmacokinetics of Pimobendan and Its Metabolite O-Desmethyl-Pimobendan Following Rectal Administration to Healthy Dogs

Affiliations

Pharmacokinetics of Pimobendan and Its Metabolite O-Desmethyl-Pimobendan Following Rectal Administration to Healthy Dogs

Jiwoong Her et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Objective: This study describes the pharmacokinetics of parent pimobendan (PIM) and its active metabolite, o-desmethyl-pimobendan (ODMP), after oral and rectal administration of pimobendan to healthy dogs. Animals: A total of eight healthy privately owned dogs were used in this study. Procedures: The dogs received a single dose (0.5 mg/kg) of a commercially available pimobendan tablet per os (PO). Twelve blood samples were collected over a 12-h period for pharmacokinetic analysis. After a 24-h washout period, the dogs received the same dose of pimobendan solution per rectum (PR), and samples were obtained at the same time for analysis. Results: For PIM, PO vs. PR, respectively, the mean maximum plasma concentration (C max, ng/ml) was 49.1 ± 28.7 vs. 10.1 ± 2, the time to reach a maximum concentration (T max, h) was 2.1 ± 0.9 vs. 1 ± 0.4, the disappearance half-life (t 1/2, h) was 1.8 ± 0.8 vs. 2.2 ± 0.6, and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC, ng*h/ml) was 148.4 ± 71.6 vs. 31.1 ± 11.9, with relative bioavailability (F, %) of 25 ± 8. For ODMP, PO vs. PR, respectively, C max was 30.9 ± 10.4 vs. 8.8 ± 4.8, T max was 3.2 ± 1.6 vs. 1.7 ± 1.1, and t 1/2 was 5.0 ± 2.7 vs. 8.3 ± 4.8, with AUC of 167.8 ± 36.2 vs. 50.1 ± 19.2 and F of 28 ± 6. The differences between PO and PR were significant (P < 0.03) for AUC and C max for both PIM and ODMP. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: The pharmacokinetics of PIM and ODMP were described following PO and PR administration. The findings suggest that pimobendan PR might achieve effective concentrations and, as such, warrant future studies of clinical effectiveness in treating dogs with congestive heart failure and which are unable to receive medication PO.

Keywords: bioavailability; congestive heart failure; pharmacokinetics; pimobendan; rectal drug administration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean ± SD of concentration–time plots of PIM and ODMP for dogs treated with a single dose of 0.5 mg/kg pimobendan per os (n = 7) vs. per rectum (n = 8). ODMP, o-desmethyl-pimobendan; PIM, pimobendan.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bell ET, Devi JL, Chiu S, Zahra P, Whittem T. The pharmacokinetics of pimobendan enantiomers after oral and intravenous administration of racemate pimobendan formulations in healthy dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. (2016) 39:54–61. 10.1111/jvp.12235 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyle KL, Leech E. A review of the pharmacology and clinical uses of pimobendan. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2012) 22:398–408. 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2012.00768.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boswood A. Current use of pimobendan in canine patients with heart disease. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. (2010) 40:571–80. 10.1016/j.cvsm.2010.04.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Keene BW, Atkins CE, Bonagura JD, Fox PR, Häggström J, Fuentes VL, et al. . ACVIM consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of myxomatous mitral valve disease in dogs. J Vet Intern Med. (2019) 33:1127–40. 10.1111/jvim.15488 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeFrancesco TC. Management of cardiac emergencies in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. (2013) 43:817–42. 10.1016/j.cvsm.2013.03.012 - DOI - PubMed