Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 10:2020:8569314.
doi: 10.1155/2020/8569314. eCollection 2020.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Ethiopia: Systematic Review

Affiliations

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Ethiopia: Systematic Review

Abel Demerew Hailu et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Abstract

Adverse drug reactions are major global public health problems and an important cause of mortality. Problems related to medicines safety can emerge from real-life medication use due to increasing access to complex treatment of concomitant infectious and noncommunicable diseases, hence leading to a higher prevalence of drug-related problems. The objective of this review was to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of adverse drug reaction reporting among health care professionals in Ethiopia. Relevant literatures were searched from Google Scholar, PubMed, Hinari, Web of Science, Scopus, and Science Direct using inclusion and exclusion criteria. From 133 searched studies, 13 studies were reviewed. The knowledge and attitude of health care professionals towards adverse drug reaction reporting ranged from 22.68% -60.33% and 47.22% -67.14%, with averages of 41.50% and 57.18%, respectively. While 46.93% encountered adverse drug reactions and 41.8% reported in the last 12 months. One-third (34.15%) of health care professionals do not know how to report adverse drug reactions. Fearing to report, uncertainty about the adverse drug reaction, concern about reporting generating extra work, thinking that one report does not make any difference, nonavailability of reporting forms, and lack of feedback from regulatory authority were the stated reasons for underreporting. We conclude that the knowledge, attitude, and practice of health care professionals towards spontaneous ADR reporting were low. Conducting awareness and educational training and implementation of electronic reporting can improve the ADR reporting practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study selection.

References

    1. Hanafi S., Torkamandi H., Hayatshahi A., Gholami K., Javadi M. Knowledge, attitudes and practice of nurse regarding adverse drug reaction reporting. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research. 2012;17(1):21–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. WHO Guide Lines on Safety Monitoring of Herbal Medicines in Pharmacovigilance Systems. World Health Organization; 2004. July 2020, https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43034.
    1. Organization WH. The Selection of Essential Medicines. World Health Organization; 2002. July 2020, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/67375/WHO_EDM_2002.2_en....
    1. Ji Y., Ying H., Dews P., et al. A potential causal association mining algorithm for screening adverse drug reactions in postmarketing surveillance. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine. 2011;15(3):428–437. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2011.2131669. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kamtane R. A., Jayawardhani V. Knowledge, attitude and perception of physicians towards adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting: a pharmacoepidemiological study. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2012;5(3):210–214.

Publication types

MeSH terms