Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 30;5(1):1126.
doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1126.

National data opt out programme: consequences for maternity statistics in England

Affiliations

National data opt out programme: consequences for maternity statistics in England

Kate Marie Lewis et al. Int J Popul Data Sci. .

Abstract

Electronic health records offer great potential for individual care, service improvement and, when collated, the health of the wider population. Datasets composed of these types of records have been invaluable to our understanding of risk factors for maternal and infant ill-health. However, a potential barrier to data quality in England is emerging where patients choose to opt out of sharing their information beyond the NHS. Focussing on maternity statistics, we will present the importance of population level health data for monitoring NHS services, and the potential consequences for patients of opting out. Evidencing the success of similar systems in Nordic countries, we argue that the English population must be better informed of the implications of opting out of sharing NHS data for research and the safeguards in place to protect patient information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Statement on conflicts of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1: Rates of patients opting out, by CCG: England (with inlay map of London CCGs), as at December 2018. Data from NHS Digital [21]
Figure 1: Rates of patients opting out, by CCG: England (with inlay map of London CCGs), as at December 2018. Data from NHS Digital [21]
Figure 2: Observed and simulated rates of deliveries by caesarean section: By CCG, 2016/17 [21, 25]
Figure 2: Observed and simulated rates of deliveries by caesarean section: By CCG, 2016/17 [21, 25]
Figure 3: Observed and simulated rates of births with very low birth weight (<1500g) observed and simulated rates: by CCG, 2016 [21, 25]
Figure 3: Observed and simulated rates of births with very low birth weight (<1500g) observed and simulated rates: by CCG, 2016 [21, 25]

References

    1. Häyrinen K, Saranto K, Nykänen P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2008;77(5):291-304. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.09.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mold F, de Lusignan S, Sheikh A, Majeed A, Wyatt JC, Quinn T, et al. Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic review in primary care. British Journal of General Practice. 2015;65(632):e141-e51. 10.3399/bjgp15X683941 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herbert A, Wijlaars L, Zylbersztejn A, Cromwell D, Hardelid P. Data Resource Profile: Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care (HES APC). International Journal of Epidemiology. 2017;46(4):1093-i 10.1093/ije/dyx015 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Webster PC. Sweden’s health data goldmine. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2014;186(9):E310-E 10.1503/cmaj.109-4713 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Smith GC, Onwere C, Mahmood TA, et al. Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2011;11(1):95. 10.1186/1471-2393-11-95 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources