Clinical evaluation of cochlear implantation in children younger than 12 months of age
- PMID: 32851352
- PMCID: PMC7331375
- DOI: 10.1002/ped4.12202
Clinical evaluation of cochlear implantation in children younger than 12 months of age
Abstract
Importance: Cochlear implantation (CI) is an effective therapy for patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. It remains controversial whether children younger than 12 months of age should undergo CI.
Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of CI in children younger than 12 months of age.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study of clinical data of pediatric patients younger than 12 months of age who underwent CI and were followed up for 1 to 2 years. Patients' developmental levels were evaluated by the Gesell score before CI. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded to evaluate the safety of CI. Auditory and speech abilities were scored by the LittlEARS® auditory questionnaire (LEAQ), categories of auditory performance (CAP), speech intelligibility rating (SIR), infant-toddler meaningful auditory integration scale (IT-MAIS), and meaningful use of speech scale (MUSS) at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after CI. The associations between clinical characteristics before CI and postoperative scores at 1 year after CI were analyzed by the linear mixed-effects model.
Results: Eighty-nine children (47 boys and 42 girls) were included in this study (mean age at CI, 9.2 ± 1.6 months). Sixteen patients were diagnosed with cochlear malformation and 16 underwent bilateral CI. No severe complications occurred in any patients. The mean developmental quotient of the Gesell score was 78.00 ± 10.03. The median LEAQ scores were 0, 5, 10, 16, 22, 26 and 30 before and at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after CI, respectively. These findings implied that the LEAQ score greatly improved in the first year after CI. The overall CAP, SIR, IT-MAIS, and MUSS scores also increased with increasing duration after CI. No significant associations were detected between clinical characteristics (age, sex, implant number, pre-CI Gesell score, and inner ear malformation) and LEAQ outcomes at 12 months after CI.
Interpretation: With increasing duration after CI, auditory and speech behavior dramatically improve in young children. Our findings indicate that CI is feasible for children younger than 12 months of age.
Keywords: Age; Children; Cochlear implantation; Outcome.
© 2020 Chinese Medical Association. Pediatric Investigation published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Futang Research Center of Pediatric Development.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Long-term Outcomes in Down Syndrome Children After Cochlear Implantation: Particular Issues and Considerations.Otol Neurotol. 2019 Dec;40(10):1278-1286. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002410. Otol Neurotol. 2019. PMID: 31634275
-
Bimodal Stimulation in Children With Bilateral Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Suitable Intervention Model for Children at the Early Developmental Stage.Otol Neurotol. 2020 Dec;41(10):1357-1362. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002812. Otol Neurotol. 2020. PMID: 33492797
-
Long term outcome of cochlear implantation in five children with common cavity deformity.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 May;79(5):685-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.02.015. Epub 2015 Feb 24. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015. PMID: 25758199
-
The value of Gesell score in predicting the outcome of cochlear implantation in children.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jul;274(7):2757-2763. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4601-0. Epub 2017 May 17. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017. PMID: 28516192
-
A review of the outcomes of children with designated additional needs receiving cochlear implantation for severe to profound hearing loss.Cochlear Implants Int. 2021 Nov;22(6):338-344. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2021.1944519. Epub 2021 Jul 5. Cochlear Implants Int. 2021. PMID: 34219615 Review.
Cited by
-
Language outcomes after cochlear implant.Can Fam Physician. 2022 Oct;68(10):737-738. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6810737. Can Fam Physician. 2022. PMID: 36241402 Free PMC article.
-
Meningitis Risk in Patients with Inner Ear Malformations after Cochlear Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Otol Neurotol. 2023 Aug 1;44(7):627-635. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003913. Epub 2023 Jun 15. Otol Neurotol. 2023. PMID: 37317518 Free PMC article.
-
Les effets sur le langage d’une implantation cochléaire.Can Fam Physician. 2022 Oct;68(10):739-741. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6810739. Can Fam Physician. 2022. PMID: 36241407 Free PMC article. French.
-
Long-Term Device Satisfaction and Safety after Cochlear Implantation in Children.J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 18;12(8):1326. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081326. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 36013275 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Han D. A brand new concept for cochlear implantation: Highlight on precision, minimal invasion, and individualization. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;53:641–644. (in Chinese) - PubMed
-
- May‐Mederake B. Early intervention and assessment of speech and language development in young children with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76:939–946. - PubMed
-
- Kim Y, Patel VA, Isildak H, Carr MM. An analysis of safety and adverse events following cochlear implantation in children under 12 months of age. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38:1426–1432. - PubMed
-
- Dror R, Malinger G, Ben‐Sira L, Lev D, Pick CG, Lerman‐Sagie T. Developmental outcome of children with enlargement of the cisterna magna identified in utero. J Child Neurol. 2009;24:1486–1492. - PubMed
-
- Weichbold V, Tsiakpini L, Coninx F, D’Haese P. Development of a parent questionnaire for assessment of auditory behaviour of infants up to two years of age. Laryngorhinootologie. 2005;84:328–334. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous