Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan;25(1):35-48.
doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02330-6. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

Colorectal resection via natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic extraction: a meta-analysis with meta-regression

Affiliations
Review

Colorectal resection via natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic extraction: a meta-analysis with meta-regression

Y H Chin et al. Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Studies have shown differences in postoperative outcomes between two minimally invasive extraction methods for colorectal lesions-natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). The aim of this study was to discover the major differences in NOSES and CLS to refine current practice.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched for articles comparing NOSES and CLS from inception till March 2020. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) were estimated for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. Summary statistics were calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects.

Results: Twenty-one studies (15 on malignant disease, 4 on benign disease, 2 on both) were included in this meta-analysis, totalling 2378 patients (1079 NOSE, 1299 CLS). NOSE was associated with decreased: intraoperative bleeding (WMD: - 10.652 ml; 95% CI: - 18.818 ml to - 2.482 ml; p < 0.001), pain score (WMD: - 1.520; 95% CI - 1.965 to - 1.076; p < 0.001), time to flatus (WMD: - 0.306 days; 95% CI: - 0.526 to - 0.085 days; p < 0.001), length of hospital stay (WMD: - 1.048 days; 95% CI: - 1.488 to - 0.609 days; p < 0.001), and total morbidity (OR: 0.548; 95% CI: 0.387 to 0.777; p = 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed significant differences between malignant and benign lesions for intraoperative bleeding (p = 0.011) and pain score (p = 0.010). Meta-regression analyses showed an association between the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification III with pain (p = 0.03) and ASA III with time to flatus (p = 0.04).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis and meta-regression demonstrated that NOSES had better postoperative outcomes compared to CLS. More comprehensive reviews should be conducted on the long-term outcomes specific to the extraction site to better inform clinical practice.

Keywords: Colonic neoplasms; Diverticulitis; Endometriosis; Laparoscopic surgery; Meta-analysis; Natural orifice specimen extraction; Rectal neoplasms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Taramasco C, Figueroa K, Lazo Y, Demongeot J (2017) Estimation of life expectancy of patients diagnosed with the most common cancers in the Valparaiso Region, Chile. Ecancermedicalscience 11:713. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.713 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Favoriti P, Carbone G, Greco M, Pirozzi F, Pirozzi REM, Corcione F (2016) Worldwide burden of colorectal cancer: a review. Updates Surg 68(1):7–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0359-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Izquierdo KM, Unal E, Marks JH (2018) Natural orifice specimen extraction in colorectal surgery: patient selection and perspectives. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 11:265–279. https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S135331 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Velanovich V (2000) Laparoscopic vs open surgery: a preliminary comparison of quality-of-life outcomes. Surg Endosc 14(1):16–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Mistrangelo M, Arezzo A, Morino M (2015) Laparoscopic versus open resection for colon cancer: 10-year outcomes of a prospective clinical trial. Surg Endosc 29(4):916–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3752-y - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources