Colorectal resection via natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic extraction: a meta-analysis with meta-regression
- PMID: 32851500
- DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02330-6
Colorectal resection via natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic extraction: a meta-analysis with meta-regression
Abstract
Background: Studies have shown differences in postoperative outcomes between two minimally invasive extraction methods for colorectal lesions-natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). The aim of this study was to discover the major differences in NOSES and CLS to refine current practice.
Methods: Electronic databases were searched for articles comparing NOSES and CLS from inception till March 2020. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) were estimated for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. Summary statistics were calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects.
Results: Twenty-one studies (15 on malignant disease, 4 on benign disease, 2 on both) were included in this meta-analysis, totalling 2378 patients (1079 NOSE, 1299 CLS). NOSE was associated with decreased: intraoperative bleeding (WMD: - 10.652 ml; 95% CI: - 18.818 ml to - 2.482 ml; p < 0.001), pain score (WMD: - 1.520; 95% CI - 1.965 to - 1.076; p < 0.001), time to flatus (WMD: - 0.306 days; 95% CI: - 0.526 to - 0.085 days; p < 0.001), length of hospital stay (WMD: - 1.048 days; 95% CI: - 1.488 to - 0.609 days; p < 0.001), and total morbidity (OR: 0.548; 95% CI: 0.387 to 0.777; p = 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed significant differences between malignant and benign lesions for intraoperative bleeding (p = 0.011) and pain score (p = 0.010). Meta-regression analyses showed an association between the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification III with pain (p = 0.03) and ASA III with time to flatus (p = 0.04).
Conclusions: This meta-analysis and meta-regression demonstrated that NOSES had better postoperative outcomes compared to CLS. More comprehensive reviews should be conducted on the long-term outcomes specific to the extraction site to better inform clinical practice.
Keywords: Colonic neoplasms; Diverticulitis; Endometriosis; Laparoscopic surgery; Meta-analysis; Natural orifice specimen extraction; Rectal neoplasms.
Similar articles
-
Meta-analysis of natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal cancer.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Mar;406(2):283-299. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01934-8. Epub 2020 Sep 2. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021. PMID: 32876788
-
Evaluation of the efficacy of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jan;27(1):e17279. doi: 10.1111/codi.17279. Colorectal Dis. 2025. PMID: 39763245
-
Safety and oncological outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Updates Surg. 2022 Jun;74(3):833-842. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01276-8. Epub 2022 Mar 18. Updates Surg. 2022. PMID: 35304899
-
The natural orifice specimen extraction surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of efficacy and long-term oncological outcomes.Int J Surg. 2022 Jan;97:106196. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106196. Epub 2021 Dec 16. Int J Surg. 2022. PMID: 34922029 Review.
-
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE-LAR) versus abdominal incision specimen extraction (AISE-LAR) for sigmoid or rectal tumors.World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug 19;18(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01982-w. World J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32814583 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Natural orifice specimen extraction for diverticular disease: technique, outcomes and role of inflammatory markers.Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul;39(7):4245-4252. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11803-4. Epub 2025 May 20. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 40394329 Free PMC article.
-
Short-term clinical effects and inflammatory response of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted surgery for the treatment of sigmoid and rectal cancer.J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Apr 29;14(2):815-823. doi: 10.21037/jgo-23-144. Epub 2023 Apr 26. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37201065 Free PMC article.
-
Pain and opioid use after robotic colectomy with natural orifice vs abdominal wall extraction: a single-institution analysis.Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12062-z. Online ahead of print. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 40825895
-
Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for cecal cancer.Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Aug 14;28(1):108. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02971-x. Tech Coloproctol. 2024. PMID: 39143393
-
Short-term outcomes of Transrectal Natural Orifice Specimen extraction compared with conventional minimally invasive surgery for selected patients with colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis and literature review.World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep 6;22(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03513-3. World J Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39242550 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Taramasco C, Figueroa K, Lazo Y, Demongeot J (2017) Estimation of life expectancy of patients diagnosed with the most common cancers in the Valparaiso Region, Chile. Ecancermedicalscience 11:713. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.713 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Favoriti P, Carbone G, Greco M, Pirozzi F, Pirozzi REM, Corcione F (2016) Worldwide burden of colorectal cancer: a review. Updates Surg 68(1):7–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0359-y - DOI - PubMed
-
- Izquierdo KM, Unal E, Marks JH (2018) Natural orifice specimen extraction in colorectal surgery: patient selection and perspectives. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 11:265–279. https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S135331 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Velanovich V (2000) Laparoscopic vs open surgery: a preliminary comparison of quality-of-life outcomes. Surg Endosc 14(1):16–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900003 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Mistrangelo M, Arezzo A, Morino M (2015) Laparoscopic versus open resection for colon cancer: 10-year outcomes of a prospective clinical trial. Surg Endosc 29(4):916–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3752-y - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical