Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Nov;34(11):1105-1120.
doi: 10.1007/s40263-020-00759-9.

Adjunctive Cenobamate for Focal-Onset Seizures in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Adjunctive Cenobamate for Focal-Onset Seizures in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simona Lattanzi et al. CNS Drugs. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Cenobamate is a novel tetrazole-derived carbamate compound with a dual mechanism of action. This drug can enhance the inactivated state of voltage-gated sodium channels, preferentially inhibiting the persistent component of the sodium channel current, and acts as a positive allosteric modulator of GABAA receptors, binding at a non-benzodiazepine site.

Objective: We assessed the efficacy and safety of adjunctive cenobamate for the treatment of focal-onset seizures in adult patients with epilepsy using meta-analytical techniques.

Methods: We systematically searched (May, week 4, 2020) MEDLINE (accessed by PubMed), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the US National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ). There were no date limitations or language restrictions. Randomized, placebo-controlled, single or double-blinded, add-on trials of cenobamate in adult patients with uncontrolled focal-onset seizures were identified. Main outcomes included the proportion of patients with ≥ 50 and 100% reduction in seizure frequency during the maintenance treatment period compared with baseline and the incidence of treatment withdrawal and adverse events (AEs). Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated for each outcome.

Results: Two trials were included, overall enrolling 659 patients (442 for the add-on cenobamate group and 217 for the add-on placebo group). Seizure frequency reduction by at least 50% occurred during the maintenance phase in 50.1% of the patients randomized to cenobamate and 23.5% of the placebo-treated participants (RR 2.18, 95% CI 1.67-2.85; p < 0.001). The pooled estimated RR to achieve seizure freedom for the cenobamate group in comparison with placebo was 3.71 (95% CI 1.93-7.14; p < 0.001). Withdrawal from randomized treatment occurred in 16.7 and 11.1% of participants receiving cenobamate and placebo, respectively (RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.85-2.09; p = 0.205). Treatment was discontinued due to AEs in 12.2 and 4.1% of the patients in the active and control arms (RR 2.27, 95% CI 1.08-4.79; p = 0.031). AEs were reported in 76.9 and 66.8% of the patients during treatment with cenobamate and placebo (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.26; p = 0.021). The cenobamate-associated AEs included somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, balance disorder, and diplopia.

Conclusions: Adjunctive cenobamate in adult patients with uncontrolled focal-onset seizures is associated with a greater reduction in seizure frequency and a higher rate of AEs than placebo.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Simona Lattanzi has received speaker’s or consultancy fees from Eisai, UCB Pharma, and GW Pharmaceuticals and has served on an advisory board for GW Pharmaceuticals. Eugen Trinka received speaker’s honoraria from UCB Pharma, Biogen, Gerot-Lannach, Bial, Eisai, Takeda, Newbridge, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., LivaNova, and Novartis; consultancy funds from UCB Pharma, Biogen, Gerot-Lannach, Bial, Eisai, Takeda, Newbridge, GW Pharmaceuticals, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Novartis; and directorship funds from Neuroconsult GmbH. E. Trinka’s institution received grants from Biogen, Red Bull, Merck, UCB Pharma, European Union, FWF Österreichischer Fond zur Wissenschaftsförderung, and Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Forschung. Gaetano Zaccara received speaker’s or consultancy fees from Eisai, Sanofi-Aventis, and UCB Pharma. Pasquale Striano received fees and research grants from GW Pharmaceuticals, Zogenyx, Biomarin, and Kolfarma s.r.l. Cinzia Del Giovane and Mauro Silvestrini have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this study. Francesco Brigo acted as a consultant for Eisai.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of study selection process. CENTRAL Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Fifty percent or greater reduction in baseline seizure frequency during the treatment maintenance period. a Cenobamate any dose, b cenobamate 100 mg/day, c cenobamate 200 mg/day, d cenobamate 400 mg/day. Risk ratios are from a fixed-effects model. CI confidence interval, CNB cenobamate
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Seventy-five percent or greater reduction in baseline seizure frequency during the treatment maintenance period. a Cenobamate any dose, b cenobamate 100 mg/day, c cenobamate 200 mg/day, d cenobamate 400 mg/day. Risk ratios are from a fixed-effects model. CI confidence interval, CNB cenobamate
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Ninety percent or greater reduction in baseline seizure frequency during the treatment maintenance period. a Cenobamate any dose, b cenobamate 100 mg/day, c cenobamate 200 mg/day. d cenobamate 400 mg/day. Risk ratios are from a fixed-effects model. CI confidence interval, CNB cenobamate
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Seizure freedom during the treatment maintenance period. a Cenobamate any dose, b cenobamate 100 mg/day, c cenobamate 200 mg/day, d cenobamate 400 mg/day. Risk ratios are from a fixed-effects model. CI confidence interval, CNB cenobamate

References

    1. Hirtz D, Thurman DJ, Gwinn-Hardy K, Mohamed M, Chaudhuri AR, Zalutsky R. How common are the “common” neurologic disorders? Neurology. 2007;68:326–337. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252807.38124.a3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cagnetti C, Lattanzi S, Foschi N, Provinciali L, Silvestrini M. Seizure course during pregnancy in catamenial epilepsy. Neurology. 2014;83:339–344. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000619. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cockerell OC, Johnson AL, Sander JW, Hart YM, Shorvon SD. Remission of epilepsy: results from the national general practice study of epilepsy. Lancet. 1995;346:140–144. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91208-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lattanzi S, Zaccara G, Giovannelli F, Grillo E, Nardone R, Silvestrini M, Trinka E, Brigo F. Antiepileptic monotherapy in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. A network meta-analysis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2019;139:33–41. doi: 10.1111/ane.13025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:314–319. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms