A randomized, intervention parallel multicentre study to evaluate duloxetine and innovative pelvic floor muscle training in women with uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence-the DULOXING study
- PMID: 32852574
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04516-w
A randomized, intervention parallel multicentre study to evaluate duloxetine and innovative pelvic floor muscle training in women with uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence-the DULOXING study
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of a combination of innovative pelvic floor muscle training (iPFMT) and duloxetine compared with the use of duloxetine alone on women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after 12 weeks of treatment.
Methods: We conducted a parallel multicentre study with randomized intervention in 45 national urological outpatient clinics. Patients with an enrolment ratio of 1:1 were divided into the experimental and control groups. The following were used for evaluation: incontinence episode frequency (IEF)/week, the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-SF), the Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (I-QoL) and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). The experimental group received oral treatment with duloxetine (a daily dose of 40 mg BID) and innovative pelvic floor muscle training (iPFMT). The control group received only oral treatment with duloxetine at a daily dose of 40 mg BID.
Results: The number of women who were evaluated was 158. The control group comprised 79 women with an average age of 56.8 ± 13.8 years and the experimental group comprised 79 women with an average age of 53.4 ± 11.9 years. There were no significant differences in pre-treatment parameters. For the intent-to-treat analysis after 12 weeks' treatment, significant differences were observed between the experimental vs. control group (p < 0.001) for the following variables: IEF/week decrease (66.7% vs. 50.0%); ICIQ-UI SF decrease (8.3 ± 3.8 vs. 9.7 ± 4.2); PGI-I (70.8% vs. 65.6%); I-QoL score increase (19.3% vs. 6.6%).
Conclusion: The addition of iPFMT to duloxetine treatment improves SUI syndrome in women compared with duloxetine treatment alone.
Registration: Clinical Trials.gov NCT04140253.
Keywords: Duloxetine; Innovative pelvic floor exercise; Stress urinary incontinence.
References
-
- Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5–26. - DOI
-
- Abrams P, Andersson KE, Apostolidis A, Birder L, Bliss D, Brubaker L, et al. 6th International Consultation on Incontinence. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF URINARY INCONTINENCE, PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE AND FAECAL INCONTINENCE. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(7):2271–2.
-
- Bernards ATM, Berghmans B, Slieker-ten Hove MCP, Staal JB, de Bie RA, Hendriks EJM. Dutch guidelines for physiotherapy in patients with stress urinary incontinence: an update. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(2):171–9. - DOI
-
- Bo K, Frawley HC, Haylen BT, Abramov Y, Almeida FG, Berghmans B, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the conservative and nonpharmacological management of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(2):221–44. - DOI
-
- Bo K, Berghmans B, Morkved S, Van Kampen M. Evidence-based physical therapy for the pelvic floor- 2nd edition. Churchill Livingstone, 2015; 446 p. ISBN 9780702060731.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
