Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;59(Suppl 2):11-23.
doi: 10.1007/s00394-020-02359-1.

Measuring health promotion: translating science into policy

Affiliations

Measuring health promotion: translating science into policy

James C Griffiths et al. Eur J Nutr. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Commonly, it is the end of life when our health is deteriorating, that many will make drastic lifestyle changes to improve their quality of life. However, it is increasingly recognized that bringing good health-promoting behaviors into practice as early in life as possible has the most significant impact across the maximal healthspan. The WHO has brought clarity to health promotion over the last fifteen years, always centering on language relating to a process of enabling people to increase control over, and to improve, their physical, mental and social health. A good healthspan is not just freedom from morbidity and mortality, it is that joie de vivre ("joy of living") that should accompany every day of our lifespan. Therefore, health promotion includes not only the health sector, but also needs individual commitment to achieve that target of a healthspan aligned with the lifespan. This paper explores health promotion and health literacy, and how to design appropriate nutritional studies to characterize contributors to a positive health outcome, the role the human microbiome plays in promoting health and addressing and alleviating morbidity and diseases, and finally how to characterize phenotypic flexibility and a physiologic resilience that we must maintain as our structural and functional systems are bombarded with the insults and perturbations of life.

Keywords: Ageing; Health promotion; Healthspan; Lifespan; Microbiome; Nutrition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J de Vries, MI McBurney, S Wopereis and JC Griffiths had their travel expenses reimbursed by CRN-I. DS Marsman and S Serttas are employees of their respective companies, Procter & Gamble Health and Herbalife International. MI McBurney consults for several companies in the field of foods, and food and nutritional ingredients. S Wopereis works for TNO and work was supported by grants to TNO from the Dutch government for several Public Private Partnerships. JC Griffiths is an employee of CRN-International. None of the authors declares any conflict of interest in providing their solely scientific opinion for this review.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Individual high-risk approach versus a population approach [50] (Rose, Sick individuals and sick populations, Int J Epidemiol, 2001, 30(3), 427–432, by permission of Oxford University Press)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Circle containing discovery sciences, observational studies and intervention studies
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Resilience [49] (Research on Investment, www.researchoninvestment.com/resilience-in-the-face-of-change/, 2020, by permission of Research in Economic Development)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Two routes can be distinguished for evidence-based health promotion as represented by the fountain of youth: (1) Through the promotion of healthy foods for the general population by health claims. Ideally foods with a health claim (structure function, function claim and disease risk reduction claim) will also be adopted by national and international dietary guidelines; (2) Through increased adherence of the general population to healthy diets and foods by means of personalized nutrition. Through personalized nutrition, people may adhere to substantiated dietary guidelines as well as to foods with substantiated health claims. Quantification of phenotypic flexibility may allow one to substantiate health effects of food and nutrition to generate next generation health claims as well as quantify health effects from application of personalized nutrition

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams SH, Anthony JC, Carvajal R, Chae L, Khoo CSH, Latulippe ME, Matusheski NV, McClung HL, Rozga M, Schmid CH, Wopereis S, Yan W. Perspective: guiding principles for the implementation of personalized nutrition approaches that benefit health and function. Adv Nutr. 2020;11(1):25–34. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz086. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aggett PJ, Hathcock J, Jukes D, Richardson DP, Calder PC, Bischoff-Ferrari H, Nicklas T, Mühlebach S, Kwon O, Lewis J, Lugard MJF, Prock P. Nutrition issues at Codex: health claims, nutrient reference values and WTO agreements: a conference report. Eur J Nutr. 2012;51:S1–7. doi: 10.1007/s00394-012-0306-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen LH, Miller JW, de Groot L, Rosenburg IH, Smith DA, Refsum H, Raiten DJ. Biomarkers of nutrition for development (BOND): vitamin B-12 review. J Nutr. 2018;148(suppl_4):1995S–2027S. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy201. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armet AM, Deehan EC, Thöne JV, Hewko SJ, Walter J. The effect of isolated and synthetic dietary fibers on markers of metabolic diseases in human intervention studies: a systematic review. Adv Nutr. 2019;11(2):420–438. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz074. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biesalski HK, Erdman JW, Hathcock J, Ellwood K, Beatty S, Johnson E, Marchioli R, Lauritzen L, Rice HB, Shao A, Griffiths JC. Nutrient reference values for bioactives: New approaches needed? A conference report. Eur J Nutr. 2013;52:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s00394-013-0503-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources