Birth weight prediction from remote ultrasound examination
- PMID: 3285269
Birth weight prediction from remote ultrasound examination
Abstract
From 259 cases studied, 245 were selected in which a live-born infant was delivered within 35 days of a complete fetal ultrasound evaluation. Multiple linear regression using the least-squares method enable us to generate an equation that incorporated lapse time (examination-to-birth interval) with the natural logarithm of head circumference, femur length, and abdominal circumference to estimate birth weight. With a lapse time mean of 16 +/- 11 days and a range of zero to 35 days, the generated equation accurately predicted birth weight (R2 = 0.84; P less than or equal to .0001). For all birth weights, the mean error was -15 +/- 306 g, the percent mean error was 0.51 +/- 10.2%, and the mean absolute error of the estimate was 82 g/kg birth weight. This accuracy was maintained across the full range of lapse time observed. For examinations performed within one week of delivery (N = 71), this formula more accurately predicted birth weight than five existing static formulas tested. The accuracy observed during model development was confirmed during testing upon 167 non-model cases. The accurate prediction of birth weight from remote ultrasound data is possible when lapse time is included in the predicting equation. The clinical value of this model is suggested when ultrasound is unavailable or unreliable.
Similar articles
-
Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length.Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Jun;65(6):812-7. Obstet Gynecol. 1985. PMID: 3889747
-
Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation and detection of small for gestational age fetuses.Am J Perinatol. 1989 Oct;6(4):400-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999626. Am J Perinatol. 1989. PMID: 2675872
-
Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight: use of targeted formulas in small for gestational age fetuses.Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;82(3):359-64. Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8355934 Review.
-
Comparison of fetal weight estimation formulas with and without head measurements.Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Apr;67(4):569-73. Obstet Gynecol. 1986. PMID: 3515257
-
Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume.Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;82(3):365-70. Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8355935 Review.
Cited by
-
Fetal growth cessation in late pregnancy: its impact on predicted size parameters used to classify small for gestational age neonates.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 May;28(7):755-65. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.934219. Epub 2014 Jul 11. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015. PMID: 24936858 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Foetal weight prediction models at a given gestational age in the absence of ultrasound facilities: application in Indonesia.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2047-z. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 30400880 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical