Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;151(9):660-667.
doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

Topographic aspects of airborne contamination caused by the use of dental handpieces in the operative environment

Topographic aspects of airborne contamination caused by the use of dental handpieces in the operative environment

Andrei C Ionescu et al. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The use of dental handpieces produces aerosols containing microbial agents, bacteria, and viruses representing a high-risk situation for airborne cross infections. The aim of this study was to map and quantify the biological contamination of a dental operatory environment using a biological tracer.

Methods: Streptococcus mutans suspension was infused into the mouth of a manikin, and an operator performed standardized dental procedures using an air turbine, a contra-angle handpiece, or an ultrasonic scaler. The presence of the tracer was measured at 90 sites on the dental unit and the surrounding surfaces of the operatory environment.

Results: All tested instruments spread the tracer over the entire dental unit and the surrounding environment, including the walls and ceiling. The pattern and degree of contamination were related to the distance from the infection source. The maximum distance of tracer detection was 360 centimeters for air turbine, 300 cm for contra-angle handpiece, and 240 cm for ultrasonic scaler. No surface of the operative environment was free from the tracer after the use of the air turbine.

Conclusions: Attention should be paid to minimize or avoid the use of rotary and ultrasonic instruments when concerns for the airborne spreading of pandemic disease agents are present.

Practical implications: This study supports the recommendations of dental associations to avoid treatments generating aerosols, especially during pandemic periods. Guidelines for the management of dental procedures involving aerosols, as well as methods for the modification of aerosols aimed to inactivate the infective agent, are urgently needed.

Keywords: Aerosols; Streptococcus; air microbiology; bacteria; communicable disease control; cross infection; decontamination; dental equipment; disease transmission; patient-to-professional.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The dental unit inside the operative environment. A. Opened agar plates that were used to evaluate the blank can be seen. The manikin head was mounted in a working position, and the bacterial suspension was attached with a drip. B. Arrows show the locations of 2 of the 6 plates that mapped tracer presence on the ceiling. C. The location of the detection sites on the floor, 60 centimeters apart from each other.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schemes representing the topographic distribution and the tracer levels after the dental procedures using the following: air turbine (A), contra-angle (B), and ultrasonic scaler (C) handpieces. Each red dot represents a measurement site on the dental unit. The 3 sites on the dental light source were averaged. The dimension of the dot represents the tracer level. The spreading pattern of spatter and aerosols close to the tip of each handpiece is displayed under each corresponding scheme. Air turbine produced the finest and farthest-spreading microparticles. CFU: Colony-forming units. cm2: Square centimeter. X: Contamination value of each site.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schemes representing the topographic distribution and the tracer levels after the dental procedures using the following: air turbine (A), contra-angle (B), and ultrasonic scaler (C) handpieces. Each red dot represents a measurement site of the operatory, including the ceilings, depicted below the main schemes. Values greater than 0.20 colony-forming units per square centimeter (CFU/cm2) are considered as high contamination levels, and the corresponding surfaces are displayed in red. Lower values indicate moderate contamination, and the corresponding surfaces are displayed in orange. White dots and surfaces represent no detection of the tracer.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Tracer presence on the different locations of the dental unit and in the operating environment expressed as colony-forming units per square centimeter (CFU/cm2). Mean (standard deviation) values are indicated, and different superscript letters indicate significant differences between groups (Tukey test, P < .05).

Comment in

  • Dental Aerosols.
    Soares BM, de Souza LN, Ferreira MVL. Soares BM, et al. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020 Nov;151(11):811. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.09.016. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020. PMID: 33121602 No abstract available.

References

    1. Volgenant C.M.C., de Soet J.J. Cross-transmission in the dental office: does this make you ill? Curr Oral Health Rep. 2018;5(4):221–228. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harrel S.K., Barnes J.B., Rivera-Hidalgo F. Aerosol and splatter contamination from the operative site during ultrasonic scaling. JADA. 1998;129(9):1241–1249. - PubMed
    1. Miller R.L., Micik R.E., Abel C., Ryge G. Studies on dental aerobiology, II: microbial splatter discharged from the oral cavity of dental patients. J Dent Res. 1971;50(3):621–625. - PubMed
    1. Szymanska J., Medicine E. Dental bioaerosol as an occupational hazard in a dentist's workplace. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2007;14(2):203–207. - PubMed
    1. Leggat P.A., Kedjarune U. Bacterial aerosols in the dental clinic: a review. Int Dent J. 2001;51(1):39–44. - PubMed