Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Jan 5;57(1):2001451.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.01451-2020. Print 2021 Jan.

Efficacy and safety of TOBI Podhaler in Pseudomonas aeruginosa- infected bronchiectasis patients: iBEST study

Affiliations
Free article
Clinical Trial

Efficacy and safety of TOBI Podhaler in Pseudomonas aeruginosa- infected bronchiectasis patients: iBEST study

Michael R Loebinger et al. Eur Respir J. .
Free article

Abstract

The study aimed to determine the efficacy of a safe and well-tolerated dose and regimen of tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP) on Pseudomonas aeruginosa sputum density in patients with bronchiectasis.This is a phase II, double-blind, randomised study in bronchiectasis patients aged ≥18 years with chronic P. aeruginosa infection. Patients were randomised 1:1:1 to either cohort A: three capsules of TIP once daily (84 mg); cohort B: five capsules once daily (140 mg) or cohort C: four capsules twice daily (224 mg). Within each cohort, patients were further randomised 2:2:1 either to TIP continuously, TIP cyclically (alternating 28 days of TIP and placebo) or placebo for 16 weeks, respectively and were followed up for 8 weeks.Overall, 107 patients were randomised to cohorts A (n=34), B (n=36) and C (n=37). All three TIP doses significantly reduced the P. aeruginosa sputum density from baseline to day 29 versus placebo in a dose-dependent manner (p≤0.0001, each). A smaller proportion of patients in the continuous-TIP (34.1%) and cyclical-TIP (35.7%) groups experienced pulmonary exacerbations versus placebo (47.6%) and also required fewer anti-pseudomonal antibiotics (38.6% on continuous TIP and 42.9% on cyclical TIP) versus placebo (57.1%) although not statistically significant. Pulmonary exacerbation of bronchiectasis was the most frequent (37.4%) adverse event. Overall, TIP was well tolerated, however, 23.4% of the patients discontinued the study drug due to adverse events.Continuous- and cyclical-TIP regimens with all three doses were safe and effective in reducing the P. aeruginosa sputum density in patients with bronchiectasis and chronic P. aeruginosa infection.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02712983.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: E. Polverino reports grants from European Union IMI Grant (in collaboration with Novartis), during the conduct of the study; and personal fees from Bayer, Menarini, Grifols, Zambon, Pfizer, Chiesi, Teva, Shire, Insmed and Polyphor, and grants from Chiesi and Grifols, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J.D. Chalmers reports grants from European Union IMI Grant (in collaboration with Novartis), during the conduct of the study; and grants and personal fees from GSK, Boehringer-Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Bayer Healthcare, Grifols, Napp, Aradigm corporation, and Insmed, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: H.A.W.M. Tiddens reports grants from European Union IMI Grant (in collaboration with Novartis), during the conduct of the study; and personal fees from Vertex and Gilead, grants and personal fees from Novartis, and grants from Roche, Vertex, Chiesi and Vectura, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: H. Goossens reports grants from European Union IMI Grant (in collaboration with Novartis), during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: M. Tunney reports grants from European Union IMI grant in collaboration with Novartis, during the conduct of the study; and grants from European Union, Novartis and Alaxia SAS, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: F.C. Ringhausen reports grants from European Union IMI Grant (in collaboration with Novartis), during the conduct of the study; and grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Aposan, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celtaxsys, Chiesi, Corbus, Grifols, InfectoPharm, Insmed, MSD, Novartis, PARI, Parion, Polyphor, Vertex and Zambon, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A.T. Hill reports grants from European Union IMI Grant (in collaboration with Novartis), during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: R. Pathan reports other from Novartis, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: G. Angyalosi reports other from Novartis, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: F. Blasi reports grants from European Union IMI Grant (in collaboration with Novartis), during the conduct of the study; and grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Grifols, Pfizer, Chiesi, GSK, Guidotti, Menarini, Novartis, Teva, Zambon and Insmed, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S.J. Elborn reports grants from European Union IMI Grant (in collaboration with Novartis), during the conduct of the study; and grants from Novartis, and personal fees from Vertex, Galapagos and Ionis, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C.S. Haworth reports grants from European Union IMI Grant (in collaboration with Novartis), during the conduct of the study; and grants and personal fees from Aradigm, Chiesi, Gilead, Grifols, GSK, Insmed, International Biophysics, Janssen, Mylan, Novartis, Teva, Vertex and Zambon, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M.R. Loebinger reports grants from European Union IMI Grant (in collaboration with Novartis), during the conduct of the study; and personal fees from Bayer, Grifols, Astra Zeneca, Insmed and Polyphor, outside the submitted work.

Comment in

Publication types

Associated data