Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;28(2):635-646.
doi: 10.1007/s40199-020-00370-9. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

The application of pharmaceutical quality by design concepts to evaluate the antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of a preservative system including desferrioxamine

Affiliations

The application of pharmaceutical quality by design concepts to evaluate the antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of a preservative system including desferrioxamine

Márcia Lombardo et al. Daru. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of a conventional preservative system containing desferrioxamine mesylate (DFO) and optimize the composition of the system through mathematical models.

Methods: Different combinations of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), sodium metabisulfite (SM), DFO and methylparaben (MP) were prepared using factorial design of experiments. The systems were added to ascorbic acid (AA) solution and the AA content over time, at room temperature and at 40 °C was determined by volumetric assay. The systems were also evaluated for antioxidant activity by a fluorescence-based assay. Antimicrobial activity was assessed by microdilution technique and photometric detection against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans and Aspergillus brasiliensis. A multi-criteria decision approach was adopted to optimize all responses by desirability functions.

Results: DFO did not extend the stability of AA over time, but displayed a better ability than EDTA to block the pro-oxidant activity of iron. DFO had a positive interaction with MP in microbial growth inhibition. The mathematical models showed adequate capacity to predict the responses. Statistical optimization aiming to meet the quality specifications of the ascorbic acid solution indicated that the presence of DFO in the composition allows to decrease the concentrations of EDTA, SM and MP.

Conclusion: DFO was much more effective than EDTA in preventing iron-catalyzed oxidation. In addition, DFO improved the inhibitory response of most microorganisms tested. The Quality by Design concepts aided in predicting an optimized preservative system with reduced levels of conventional antioxidants and preservatives, suggesting DFO as a candidate for multifunctional excipient.

Keywords: Antioxidant; Desferrioxamine; Design space; Experimental design; Preservative.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Response surface 3D plots showing the effect of the percentage (w/v) of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (X1), sodium metabisulfite (X2) and desferrioxamine mesylate (X3) on the ascorbic acid concentration (mg/mL) over time at room temperature (Y1) and at 40 °C (Y2). When not showed in the plot, the level of the factors X1 and X3 was fixed at zero
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Response surface 3D plots showing the effect of the percentage (w/v) of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (X1), sodium metabisulfite (X2) and desferrioxamine mesylate (X3) on the antioxidant activity expressed as fluorescence units/min (Y3). When not showed in the plot, the level of the factor X1 was fixed at zero, X2 at 5.3 μM (0.1% w/v) and X3 at 2.7 μM (0.1% w/v)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Response surface 3D plots showing the effect of the percentage (w/v) of sodium metabisulfite (X2), desferrioxamine (X3) and methylparaben (X4) on antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus (Y4) expressed as percentage of microbial growth inhibition. When not showed in the plot, the level of the factors X1, X2, X3 and X4 was fixed at 0.1% (w/v)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Response surface 3D plots showing the effect of the percentage (w/v) of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (X1), sodium metabisulfite (X2), desferrioxamine (X3) and methylparaben (X4) on antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli (Y5) expressed as percentage of microbial growth inhibition. When not showed in the plot, the level of the factors X1, X2, X3 and X4 was fixed at 0.1% (w/v)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Response surface 3D plots showing the effect of the percentage (w/v) of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (X1), sodium metabisulfite (X2), desferrioxamine (X3) and methylparaben (X4) on antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Y6) expressed as percentage of microbial growth inhibition. When not showed in the plot, the level of the factors X1, X2, X3 and X4 was fixed at 0.1% (w/v)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Response surface 3D plots showing the effect of the percentage (w/v) of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (X1), sodium metabisulfite (X2), desferrioxamine (X3) and methylparaben (X4) on antimicrobial activity against Candida albicans (Y7) expressed as percentage of microbial growth inhibition. When not showed in the plot, the level of the factors X1, X2, X3 and X4 was fixed at 0.1% (w/v)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Response surface 3D plot showing the effect of the percentage (w/v) of desferrioxamine (X3) and methylparaben (X4) on antimicrobial activity against Aspergillus brasiliensis (Y8) expressed as percentage of microbial growth inhibition. When not showed in the plot, the level of the factors X1 and X2 was fixed at 0.1% (w/v)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Overlapped contour plots and Design Space regions for the determination of ascorbic acid concentration (mg/mL) over time at room temperature (Y1) and at 40 °C (Y2), for the antioxidant activity expressed as fluorescence units/min (Y3), and for the antimicrobial activity expressed as percentage of microbial growth inhibition against Staphylococcus aureus (Y4), Escherichia coli (Y5), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Y6), Candida albicans (Y7) and Aspergillus brasiliensis (Y8), as a function of the percentage (w/v) of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (X1), desferrioxamine mesylate (X3) and methylparaben (X4). When not showed in the plot, the level of the factor X1 was fixed at 0.025% (w/v), X2 at zero, X3 at 0.1% (w/v) and X4 at 0.025% (w/v)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yu LX, Amidon G, Khan MA, Hoag SW, Polli J, Raju GK, Woodcock J. Understanding pharmaceutical quality by design. AAPS J. 2014;16(4):771–783. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Halla N, Fernandes IP, Heleno SA, Costa P, Boucherit-Otmani Z, Boucheirt K, et al. Cosmetics preservation: a review on present strategies. Molecules. 2018;23(7):1–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pifferi G, Santoro P, Pedrani M. Quality and functionality of excipients. Farmaco. 1999;54(1–2):1–14. - PubMed
    1. Abrutyn ES. Deciphering chelating agent formulas. In: Cosmetics & Toiletries. 2013. https://www.cosmeticsandtoiletries.com/formulating/function/aids/premium.... Accessed 12 Nov 2019.
    1. Chaturvedi S, Dave PN. Removal of iron for safe drinking water. Desalination. 2012;303:1–11.

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources