High clinical performance and quantitative assessment of antibody kinetics using a dual recognition assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies
- PMID: 32858061
- PMCID: PMC7445483
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.08.009
High clinical performance and quantitative assessment of antibody kinetics using a dual recognition assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies
Abstract
Objectives: Several serological SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays have been developed recently but require external validation before widespread use. This study aims at assessing the analytical and clinical performance of the iFlash® anti-SARS-CoV-2 chemiluminescence assay for the detection of both IgM and IgG antibodies. The kinetics of the antibody response was also evaluated.
Design & methods: The precision, carry-over, linearity, limit of blank, detection and quantification were assessed. Sensitivity analysis was performed by using 178 sera collected from 154 RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients. The specificity analysis was performed from 75 selected non-SARS-CoV-2 sera with a potential cross-reaction to the SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay.
Results: This iFlash® SARS-CoV-2 assay showed excellent analytical performance. After 2 weeks since symptom onset, the sensitivities for IgM and IgG were 62.2% (95% CI: 52.3-71.2%) and 92.9%% (95% CI: 85.7-96.7%), respectively by using the cut-off provided by the manufacturer. After cut-off optimization (i.e. >2.81 for IgM and >4.86 for IgG), the sensitivity for IgM and IgG were 81.6 (95% CI: 72.7-88.1%) and 95.9% (95% CI: 89.4-98.7%), respectively. Optimized cut-off for IgG improved the sensitivity to reach 100% (95%CI: 87.6-100) from 28 days since symptom onset.
Conclusions: This study shows that the iFlash® SARS-CoV-2 assay from YHLO biotechnology, has satisfactory analytical performance. Nevertheless, the sensitivity of the IgM is limited for a proper clinical use compared to IgG. The determination of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies from 28 days since symptom onset was associated with high sensitivity, especially using optimized cut-offs (i.e. 100%).
Keywords: COVID-19; Kinetics; SARS-CoV-2; Serology; Symptom onset.
Copyright © 2020 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Analytical and clinical validation of an ELISA for specific SARS-CoV-2 IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies.J Med Virol. 2021 Feb;93(2):803-811. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26303. Epub 2020 Jul 27. J Med Virol. 2021. PMID: 32667733 Free PMC article.
-
Recent Advances in the Evaluation of Serological Assays for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19.Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 18;8:620222. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.620222. eCollection 2020. Front Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33681115 Free PMC article.
-
Analytical measuring interval, linearity, and precision of serology assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies according to CLSI guidelines.mSphere. 2024 Nov 21;9(11):e0039324. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00393-24. Epub 2024 Oct 31. mSphere. 2024. PMID: 39480103 Free PMC article.
-
Seropositivity rate and diagnostic accuracy of serological tests in 2019-nCoV cases: a pooled analysis of individual studies.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Oct;24(19):10208-10218. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202010_23243. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020. PMID: 33090430 Review.
-
Diagnostic performance of COVID-19 serological assays during early infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 516 samples.Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2021 Jul;15(4):529-538. doi: 10.1111/irv.12841. Epub 2021 Feb 20. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2021. PMID: 33609075 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Cross-Reactivity of Two SARS-CoV-2 Serological Assays in a Setting Where Malaria Is Endemic.J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Jun 18;59(7):e0051421. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00514-21. Epub 2021 Jun 18. J Clin Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 33853839 Free PMC article.
-
Landscape of humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19 disease and the value of antibody testing.Heliyon. 2021 Apr;7(4):e06836. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06836. Epub 2021 Apr 17. Heliyon. 2021. PMID: 33898857 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Family Transmission of COVID-19 Including a Child with MIS-C and Acute Pancreatitis.Int Med Case Rep J. 2021 Feb 5;14:55-65. doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S284480. eCollection 2021. Int Med Case Rep J. 2021. PMID: 33574714 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Efficacy of 11 SARS-CoV-2 Serological Assays for COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis and Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024 Dec;12(12):e70114. doi: 10.1002/iid3.70114. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024. PMID: 39698931 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of the Roche/Snibe electrochemiluminescent anti-SARS-COV-2 spike assays compared to the Roche/Abbott IgG nucleocapsid and Abbott IgM spike assays.Pract Lab Med. 2021 Nov;27:e00257. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00257. Epub 2021 Oct 13. Pract Lab Med. 2021. PMID: 34660869 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) - Weekly Epidemiological Update - 23 August 2020.
-
- G. Lippi, A.M. Simundic, M. Plebani, Potential preanalytical and analytical vulnerabilities in the laboratory diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), Clin. Chem. Lab. Med.: CCLM/FESCC 1 (2020). (ahead-of-print). PubMed PMID: 32172228. Epub 2020/03/17. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous