Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 1;22(5):405-413.
doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001048.

Influence of ageing on circadian rhythm of heart rate variability in healthy subjects

Agostino Accardo  1 , Marco Merlo  2 , Giulia Silveri  1 , Lucia Del Popolo  2 , Luca Dalla Libera  2 , Luca Restivo  2 , Martino Cinquetti  2 , Antonio Cannatà  2   3 , Gianfranco Sinagra  2
Affiliations

Influence of ageing on circadian rhythm of heart rate variability in healthy subjects

Agostino Accardo et al. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). .

Abstract

Background: The analysis of the circadian rhythm of heart rate variability (HRV) represents a relevant physiological tool to assess the vagal system. However, the influence of age (mostly >75 years) on HRV is not widely known.

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of age on HRV, particularly in the elderly and to identify a model of this relationship. The study was carried out by examining linear and nonlinear parameters extracted from HRV, including individuals over 75 years for which there is no research available.

Methods: Data from 140 healthy subjects were sex matched and divided into young (young group: 15-39 years old), adult (adult group: 40-64 years old) and senior (senior group: 65-90 years old) groups. 24-h Holter monitoring was used and several HRV parameters were extracted from time, and spectral and nonlinear analyses were examined.

Results: Time-domain parameters, mainly standard deviation of the NN interval (SDNN) and number of successive differences of intervals which differ by more than 50 ms, presented significant differences between the young group and the other two groups during the 24-h period, while normalized spectral parameters (LFn, HFn and low frequency/high frequency), as well as nonlinear parameters, mainly β exponent and fractal dimension, showed significant difference between the senior group and the other two groups. All these parameters showed a similar circadian rhythm with significant differences between the mean day and night values, especially in young and adult group cohorts. Moreover, a parabolic relationship between these parameters and age was highlighted with an opposite trend over about 60 years compared with younger people.

Conclusion: A progressive physiological autonomic imbalance is present in ageing. The inverse trend in the relation between HRV parameters and age found in the senior group could be mainly due to a faster fluctuation of RR. This should be considered when studying changes in the cardiac autonomic nervous control.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dhingra D, Vasan RS. Age as a cardiovacular risk factor. Med Clin North Am 2012; 96:87–91.
    1. Nicolini P, Ciulla MM, De Asmundis C, Magrini F, Brugada P. The prognostic value of heart rate variability in the elderly, changing the perspective: from sympathovagal balance to chaos theory. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2012; 35:621–637.
    1. Kleiger RE, Miller JP, Bigger JT Jr, Moss AJ. Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59:256–262.
    1. Bigger JT Jr, Fleiss JL, Steinman RC, Rolnitzky LM, Kleiger RE, Rottman JN. Frequency domain measures of heart period variability and mortality after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1992; 85:164–171.
    1. Hartikainen JE, Malik M, Staunton A, Poloniecki J, Camm AJ. Distinction between arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic death after acute myocardial infarction based on heart rate variability, signal-averaged electrocardiogram, ventricular arrhythmias and left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28:296–304.