Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Aug 28;19(1):92.
doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00609-w.

Perceived stress and diet quality in women of reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Karim Khaled  1 , Fotini Tsofliou  2   3 , Vanora Hundley  4 , Rebecca Helmreich  5 , Orouba Almilaji  6
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Perceived stress and diet quality in women of reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Karim Khaled et al. Nutr J. .

Abstract

Background: Poor diet quality is associated with obesity-related morbidity and mortality. Psychological stress can increase unhealthy dietary choices, but evidence pertinent to women of reproductive age remains unclear. This paper systematically reviewed the literature to determine the association between psychological stress and diet quality in women of reproductive age.

Methods: Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Sciencedirect were searched. Data extraction was determined by the PEO. Inclusion criteria consisted of: English language, stress (exposure) measured in combination with diet quality (outcome), healthy women of reproductive age (18-49 years old (population)). Observational studies, due to the nature of the PEO, were included. Quality assessment used the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies from the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effect model to estimate the Fisher's z transformed correlation between stress and diet quality with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: From 139,552 hits, 471 papers were screened; 24 studies met the inclusion criteria and were conducted in different countries: 8 studies on diet quality and 16 on food intake and frequency of consumption. Studies of diet quality consisted of six cross-sectional and two longitudinal designs with a total of 3982 participants. Diet quality was measured with diverse indices; Alternate Healthy Eating Index (n = 2), Healthy Eating Index (n = 2), Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet Index (n = 2), Dietary Quality Index- Pregnancy (n = 2), and Dietary Guideline Adherence Index (n = 1). Most studies used Cohen's perceived stress scale and no study measured biological stress response. After sensitivity analysis, only 5 studies (3471 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed a significant negative association between stress and diet quality with substantial heterogeneity between studies (r = - 0.35, 95% CI [- 0.56; - 0.15], p value < 0.001, Cochran Q test P < 0.0001, I2 = 93%). The 16 studies of food intake and frequency of consumption were very heterogeneous in the outcome measure and were not included in the meta-analysis. These studies showed that stress was significantly associated with unhealthy dietary patterns (high in fat, sweets, salt, and fast food and low in fruits, vegetables, fish, and unsaturated fats).

Conclusion: Future studies that explore diet quality/patterns should include both diet indices and factor analysis and measure biological markers of stress and dietary patterns simultaneously.

Keywords: Diet; Diet quality; Meta-analysis; Reproductive age; Stress; Systematic review; Women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) flow chart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Association between stress and diet quality (five studies based on correlation coefficient “r” and converted β coefficients to “r”)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Weighed bar plot of the distribution of risk-of-bias judgments within each bias domain
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Vidal EJ, Alvarez D, Martinez-Velarde D, Vidal-Damas L, Yuncar-Rojas KA, Julca-Malca A, et al. Perceived stress and high fat intake: a study in a sample of undergraduate students. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0192827. - PMC - PubMed
    1. CMACE . Maternal obesity in the UK: findings from a national project: maternal, Confidential Enquiry. 2010.
    1. Poston L, Caleyachetty R, Cnattingius S, Corvalán C, Uauy R, Herring S, et al. Preconceptional and maternal obesity: epidemiology and health consequences. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(12):1025–1036. - PubMed
    1. Reynolds RM, Allan KM, Raja EA, Bhattacharya S, McNeill G, Hannaford PC, et al. Maternal obesity during pregnancy and premature mortality from cardiovascular event in adult offspring: follow-up of 1 323 275 person years. BMJ. 2013;347:f4539. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kanguru L, McCaw-Binns A, Bell J, Yonger-Coleman N, Wilks R, Hussein J. The burden of obesity in women of reproductive age and in pregnancy in a middle-income setting: a population based study from Jamaica. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0188677. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources