Observer agreement and clinical significance of chest CT reporting in patients suspected of COVID-19
- PMID: 32862289
- PMCID: PMC7456359
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07126-8
Observer agreement and clinical significance of chest CT reporting in patients suspected of COVID-19
Abstract
Objectives: To assess interobserver agreement and clinical significance of chest CT reporting in patients suspected of COVID-19.
Methods: From 16 to 24 March 2020, 241 consecutive patients addressed to hospital for COVID-19 suspicion had both chest CT and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. Eight observers (2 thoracic and 2 general senior radiologists, 2 junior radiologists, and 2 emergency physicians) retrospectively categorized each CT into one out of 4 categories (evocative, compatible for COVID-19 pneumonia, not evocative, and normal). Observer agreement for categorization between all readers and pairs of readers with similar experience was evaluated with the Kappa coefficient. The results of a consensus categorization were correlated to RT-PCR.
Results: Observer agreement across the 4 categories was good between all readers (κ value 0.61 95% CI 0.60-0.63) and moderate to good between pairs of readers (0.54-0.75). It was very good (κ 0.81 95% CI 0.79-0.83), fair (κ 0.32 95% CI 0.29-0.34), moderate (κ 0.56 95% CI 0.54-0.58), and moderate (0.58 95% CI 0.56-0.61) for the categories evocative, compatible, not evocative, and normal, respectively. RT-PCR was positive in 97%, 50%, 31%, and 11% of cases in the respective categories. Observer agreement was lower (p < 0.001) and RT-PCR positive cases less frequently categorized evocative in the presence of an underlying pulmonary disease (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Interobserver agreement for chest CT reporting using categorization of findings is good in patients suspected of COVID-19. Among patients considered for hospitalization in an epidemic context, CT categorized evocative is highly predictive of COVID-19, whereas the predictive value of CT decreases between the categories compatible and not evocative.
Key points: • In patients suspected of COVID-19, interobserver agreement for chest CT reporting into categories is good, and very good to categorize CT "evocative." • Chest CT can participate in estimating the likelihood of COVID-19 in patients presenting to hospital during the outbreak, CT categorized "evocative" being highly predictive of the disease whereas almost a third of patients with CT "not evocative" had a positive RT-PCR in our study. • Observer agreement is lower and CTs of positive RT-PCR cases less frequently "evocative" in presence of an underlying pulmonary disease.
Keywords: Coronavirus infections; Pneumonia; Tomography, X-ray computed.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Performance of Chest Computed Tomography in Differentiating Coronavirus Disease 2019 From Other Viral Infections Using a Standardized Classification.J Thorac Imaging. 2021 Jan;36(1):31-36. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000563. J Thorac Imaging. 2021. PMID: 33003105
-
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Expert Consensus Statement Related to Chest CT Findings in COVID-19 Versus CO-RADS: Comparison of Reporting System Performance Among Chest Radiologists and End-User Preference.Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021 Nov;72(4):806-813. doi: 10.1177/0846537120968919. Epub 2020 Nov 3. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021. PMID: 33138634
-
Diagnostic performance between CT and initial real-time RT-PCR for clinically suspected 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients outside Wuhan, China.Respir Med. 2020 Jul;168:105980. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.105980. Epub 2020 Apr 21. Respir Med. 2020. PMID: 32364959 Free PMC article.
-
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 26;11:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub3. PMID: 32997361 Updated.
-
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 26;11:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 16;3:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub4. PMID: 33242342 Updated.
Cited by
-
Inter-reader agreement of high-resolution computed tomography findings in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: A multi-reader study.Radiol Med. 2021 Apr;126(4):577-584. doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01320-w. Epub 2021 Jan 3. Radiol Med. 2021. PMID: 33389557 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Performance of Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests, Chest Computed Tomography, and Lung Point-of-Care-Ultrasonography for SARS-CoV-2 Compared with RT-PCR Testing: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 24;12(6):1302. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061302. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35741112 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Differentiation of Chest CT Findings Between Influenza Pneumonia and COVID-19: Interobserver Agreement Between Radiologists.Acad Radiol. 2021 Oct;28(10):1331-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.04.010. Epub 2021 May 11. Acad Radiol. 2021. PMID: 34024714 Free PMC article.
-
Blood fibrocytes are associated with severity and prognosis in COVID-19 pneumonia.Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2021 Nov 1;321(5):L847-L858. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00105.2021. Epub 2021 Sep 8. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2021. PMID: 34496650 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Patients with Negative Nasopharyngeal Swabs: Reliability of Radiological and Clinical Diagnosis and Accuracy Versus Serology.Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Feb 25;11(3):386. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030386. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33668734 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization (2020) Director General’s speeches. https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-re.... Accessed 27 Apr 2020
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous