Functional treatment strategy for fragility fractures of the pelvis in geriatric patients
- PMID: 32862316
- DOI: 10.1007/s00068-020-01484-0
Functional treatment strategy for fragility fractures of the pelvis in geriatric patients
Abstract
Purpose: We propose a functional treatment strategy for fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) in geriatric patients; patients with such fractures normally undergo 10 days of conservative therapy with full-weight bearing within pain limits. Conservative therapy for FFP is continued for patients who can stand with assistance, and surgical stabilization is recommended for patients with difficulty in auxiliary standing at 10 day postadmission. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of functional treatment between geriatric patients with FFP type I/II and those with FFP type III/IV, as described by Rommens et al. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 84 geriatric patients who underwent functional treatment for FFP. Based on the results of the first examination, the patients were allocated to the following FFP types: type I/II (n = 53) and type III/IV (n = 31). Change in functional mobility scale described by Graham et al. from before injury to the final follow-up were compared between the groups.
Results: There was no significant difference in the functional mobility scale (0.25 ± 0.70 vs. 0.23 ± 0.56, p = 0.889) between FFP type I/II and FFP type III/IV.
Conclusion: The outcomes of the functional treatment for FFP for the geriatric patients did not differ significantly between the radiographic classifications. Functional treatment could, therefore, be a treatment option for almost all radiographic types of FFP, especially for geriatric patients. Further investigations are warranted.
Keywords: Conservative treatment; Fragility fractures of the pelvis; Functional treatment strategy; Geriatric patient.
Similar articles
-
Mobility and mortality of 340 patients with fragility fracture of the pelvis.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Feb;47(1):29-36. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01481-3. Epub 2020 Aug 28. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021. PMID: 32860102
-
Fragility fractures of the pelvis: should they be fixed?Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(2):101-12. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015. PMID: 26317181
-
Mortality and functional outcomes of fragility fractures of the pelvis by fracture type with conservative treatment: a retrospective, multicenter TRON study.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Aug;48(4):2897-2904. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01839-1. Epub 2021 Dec 1. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022. PMID: 34850256 Review.
-
Is there a correlation between fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) and the morphology of the true pelvis in geriatric patients?Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Feb;47(1):3-10. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01439-5. Epub 2020 Jul 19. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021. PMID: 32685986
-
Classifications and treatment management of fragility fracture of the pelvis: A scoping review.Injury. 2025 Mar;56(3):112206. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112206. Epub 2025 Feb 9. Injury. 2025. PMID: 39983532
Cited by
-
Posterior pelvic ring involvement detected with CT taken within a week of admission in acute fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) does not predict failure of conservative treatment: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 22;24(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06439-1. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023. PMID: 37087474 Free PMC article.
-
Does regional implementation of a clinical pathway for older adult patients with pelvic fragility fractures after low-energy trauma improve patient outcomes (PELVIC): a multicentre, stepped-wedge, randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 13;14(8):e083809. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083809. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39142675 Free PMC article.
-
Conservative or operative therapy in patients with a fragility fracture of the pelvis: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2024 Jul 30;25(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08350-z. Trials. 2024. PMID: 39080698 Free PMC article.
-
Inverse association between sarcopenia and displacement in the early phase of fragility fractures of the pelvis.Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2022 Mar;8(1):24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Mar 22. Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2022. PMID: 35415276 Free PMC article.
-
Fragility Fractures of the Pelvic Ring: Analysis of Epidemiology, Treatment Concepts, and Surgical Strategies from the Registry of the German Pelvic Multicenter Study Group.J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 24;14(9):2935. doi: 10.3390/jcm14092935. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40363969 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rommens PM, Hofmann A. Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: Recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury. 2013;44:1733–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.023 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rommens PM, Ossendorf C, Pairon P, Dietz S-O, Wagner D, Hofmann A. Clinical pathways for fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: personal experience and review of the literature. J Orthop Sci. 2015;20:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0653-9 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Krappinger D, Kaser V, Kammerlander C, Neuerburg C, Merkel A, Lindtner RA. Inter- and Intraobserver reliability and critical analysis of the FFP classification of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries. Injury. 2019;50:337–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.11.027 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Berger-Groch J, Thiesen DM, Grossterlinden LG, Schaewel J, Fensky F, Hartel MJ. The intra- and interobserver reliability of the Tile AO, the Young and Burgess, and FFP classifications in pelvic trauma. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139:645–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03123-9 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Natoli RM, Fogel HA, Holt D, Schiff A, Bernstein M, Summers HD, et al. Advanced imaging lacks clinical utility in treating geriatric pelvic ring injuries caused by low-energy trauma. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31:194–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000761 . - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical