Transient Respiratory-motion Artifact and Scan Timing during the Arterial Phase of Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MR Imaging: The Benefit of Shortened Acquisition and Multiple Arterial Phase Acquisition
- PMID: 32863326
- PMCID: PMC8424022
- DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2020-0064
Transient Respiratory-motion Artifact and Scan Timing during the Arterial Phase of Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MR Imaging: The Benefit of Shortened Acquisition and Multiple Arterial Phase Acquisition
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate whether shortened acquisition or multiple arterial phase acquisition improves image quality of the arterial phase compared with conventional protocol.
Methods: This retrospective study was approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board. A total of 615 consecutive patients who underwent gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI including one of the following three sequences in three different periods were included: (i) conventional liver acquisition with volume acceleration (LAVA) (between October 2014 and January 2015, n = 149), (ii) Turbo-LAVA (between March and August 2016, n = 216), and (iii) differential sub-sampling with Cartesian ordering (DISCO) (between January and September 2015, n = 250). We monitored the respiratory bellows waveform during breath holding for each patient and recorded breath-hold fidelity of the patients. Two radiologists independently evaluated the degree of respiratory artifact and scan timing on the arterial phase and compared them between the three protocols (i.e., conventional LAVA, Turbo-LAVA, and DISCO), with conventional LAVA as control.
Results: The ratio of patients with breath-hold failure was not significantly different among the three protocols (P = 0.6340 and 0.1085). Respiratory artifact was significantly lower in DISCO than in conventional LAVA (P = 0.0424), while there was no significant difference between Turbo-LAVA and conventional LAVA (P = 0.2593). The ratio of adequate scan timing and diagnosable image defined as no or mild artifact and adequate scan timing were higher in DISCO than in conventional LAVA (P = 0.0025 and 0.0019), while there was no significant difference between Turbo-LAVA and conventional LAVA (P = 0.0780 and 0.0657).
Conclusion: Compared with conventional protocol, multiple arterial phase acquisition (DISCO) obtained a higher number of diagnosable images by reducing respiratory motion artifact and optimizing the scan timing of arterial phase.
Keywords: artifacts; gadoxetate disodium; image reconstruction; liver; magnetic resonance imaging.
Conflict of interest statement
The co-author Tetsuya Wakayama is an employee of GE Healthcare. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Kim SS, Kim SH, Song KD, Choi SY, Heo NH. Value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of hypervascular hyperplastic nodule from small (<3 cm) hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis: a retrospective case-control study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 51:70–80. - PubMed
-
- Moon JY, Kim SH, Choi SY, Hwang JA, Lee JE, Lee J. Differentiating malignant from benign hyperintense nodules on unenhanced T1-weighted images in patients with chronic liver disease: using gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Jpn J Radiol 2018; 36:489–499. - PubMed
-
- Vanhooymissen IJSML, Thomeer MG, Braun LMM, et al. Intrapatient comparison of the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in the differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma from focal nodular hyperplasia. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 49:700–710. - PubMed
-
- Nakao S, Tanabe M, Okada M, et al. Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: comparison between computed tomography and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Jpn J Radiol 2019; 37:651–659. - PubMed
-
- Li J, Wang J, Lei L, Yuan G, He S. The diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of eight prospective studies. Eur Radiol 2019; 29:6519–6528. - PubMed
