Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;51(11):1231-1239.
doi: 10.1080/02786826.2017.1341040. Epub 2017 Jun 30.

Clouds and "throat hit": Effects of liquid composition on nicotine emissions and physical characteristics of electronic cigarette aerosols

Affiliations

Clouds and "throat hit": Effects of liquid composition on nicotine emissions and physical characteristics of electronic cigarette aerosols

Mohammad Baassiri et al. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2017.

Abstract

Electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) heat and vaporize a liquid mixture to produce an inhalable aerosol that can deliver nicotine to the user. The liquid mixture is typically composed of propylene glycol (PG) and vegetable glycerin (VG), in which are dissolved trace quantities of flavorants and, usually, nicotine. Due to their different chemical and thermodynamic properties, the proportions of PG and VG in the liquid solution may affect nicotine delivery and user sensory experience. In social media and popular culture, greater PG fraction is associated with greater "throat-hit", a sensation that has been attributed in cigarette smokers to increased presence of vapor-phase nicotine. VG, on the other hand, is associated with thicker and larger exhaled "clouds". In this study, we aim to investigate how PG/VG ratio influences variables that relate to nicotine delivery and plume visibility. Aerosols from varying PG/VG liquids were generated using a digitally controlled vaping instrument and a commercially available ECIG, and analyzed for nicotine content by GC-MS. Particle mass and number distribution were determined using a six-stage cascade impactor and a fast particle spectrometer (TSI EEPS), with tightly controlled dilution and sampling biases. A Mie theory model was used to compute the aerosol scattering coefficients in the visible spectrum. Decreasing the PG/VG ratio resulted in a decrease in total particulate matter (TPM) and nicotine yield (R2 > 0.9, p<.0001). Measured particle count median diameter ranged between 44-97nm, and was significantly smaller for PG liquids. Although the particle mass concentration was lower, aerosols produced using liquids that contained VG had an order of magnitude greater light scattering coefficients. These findings indicate that PG/VG ratio is a strong determinant of both nicotine delivery and user sensory experience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of a “tank” ECIG. When the battery is activated, the heating element heats and vaporizes the nicotine-containing liquid present in the wick. The resulting vapor is swept away towards the mouth-end of the device. As it travels through the air tube, the vapor cools and condenses into an inhalable mist.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Experimental setup used to measure particle mass distribution
Figure 3
Figure 3
Experimental setup for measurement of particle number distribution
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of PG/VG on TPM and nicotine yields in 15 puffs of 4 s duration and 66.7 ml volume (total volume in 15 puffs = 1 liter). ECIG operating at 4.3 W. (Mean±SD, N=3)
Figure 5
Figure 5
Measured particle mass distribution for 100/0, 70/30, and 0/100 PG/VG conditions. (Mean±SD; N=5 repeated measurements per condition.)
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effect of liquid composition on measured particle number distribution for 100/0, 70/30, and 0/100 PG/VG conditions. Mean of three 15-puff data sets shown for each liquid.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Effect of liquid composition on computed light scattering coefficient (total scattering cross-section of the aerosol particles per unit volume of air).

References

    1. Barbeau AM, Burda J, and Siegel M (2013). “Perceived efficacy of e-cigarettes versus nicotine replacement therapy among successful e-cigarette users: a qualitative approach.” Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 8(1), 1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bohren CF, and Huffman DR (1983). Absorption and scattering of light by small particles. Wiley; New York, .
    1. Bullen C, McRobbie H, Thornley S, Glover M, Lin R, and Laugesen M (2010). “Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e cigarette) on desire to smoke and withdrawal, user preferences and nicotine delivery: randomised cross-over trial.” Tob.Control, 19(2), 98–103. - PubMed
    1. Cheah NP, Chong NW, Tan J, Morsed FA, and Yee SK (2014). “Electronic nicotine delivery systems: regulatory and safety challenges: Singapore perspective.” Tob.Control, 23(2), 119–125. - PubMed
    1. Eissenberg T (2010). “Electronic nicotine delivery devices: ineffective nicotine delivery and craving suppression after acute administration.” Tob.Control, 19(1), 87–88. - PMC - PubMed