Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;24(6):459-464.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23459.

Comparison of Efficacy of LUS and CXR in the Diagnosis of Children Presenting with Respiratory Distress to Emergency Department

Affiliations

Comparison of Efficacy of LUS and CXR in the Diagnosis of Children Presenting with Respiratory Distress to Emergency Department

Laila M Hegazy et al. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Respiratory distress (RD) in children is a life-threatening condition. Delay in diagnosis has a deleterious effect on morbidity and mortality. The bedside lung ultrasound in emergency (BLUE) is a fast method that aims to accelerate the diagnosis with minimal radiological exposure. We targeted to evaluate the efficacy of BLUE protocol to speed and increase the precision of recognizing the cause of RD compared with chest X-ray (CXR) in the emergency department.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study on 63 children with RD attended the emergency of a tertiary, university-affiliated, pediatric medical center between January 2017 and January 2018.

Results: Most cases were males 52.4%. We designed to estimate the value of BLUE as a diagnostic tool for RD and comparing it with CXR. Pneumonia with or without pleural effusion was the main etiology of RD detected by BLUE in 47.7% of studied children, pulmonary edema in 22.2%, bronchiolitis and asthma in 17.4%, and pneumothorax in 12.7%. Lung ultrasound (LUS) was superior to CXR in the diagnosis of RD cause, and most cases, 47.7% were diagnosed with pneumonia with a sensitivity of 93.5% and specificity 96.9%.

Conclusion: Bedside lung ultrasound in emergency is an effective tool for identifying the cause of RD which is more sensitive and specific compared with CXR.

How to cite this article: Hegazy LM, Rezk AR, Sakr HM, Ahmed AS. Comparison of Efficacy of LUS and CXR in the Diagnosis of Children Presenting with Respiratory Distress to Emergency Department. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(6):459-464.

Keywords: Bedside lung ultrasound in emergency protocol; Chest X-ray; Emergency; Pediatrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Figs 1A to D
Figs 1A to D
Anterior lung consolidation C profile
Figs 2A to D
Figs 2A to D
RT pleural effusion (C) associated with lung consolidation (D) PLAPS profile
Figs 3A to D
Figs 3A to D
Confluent B-lines
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Lung ultrasound M mode_V2

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Warren J, Fromm REJ, Orr RA, Rotello LC, Horst HM. Guidelines for the inter- and intrahospital transport of critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2004;;32((1):):256––262.. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000104917.39204.0A. DOI: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baldi G, Gargani L, Abramo A, D’Errico L, Caramella D, Picano E, et al. Lung water assessment by lung ultrasonography in intensive care: a pilot study. Intensive Care Med. 2013;;39((1):):74––84.. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2694-x. DOI: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Volpicelli G, El Barbary M, Blaivas M, Lichtenstein D, Mathis G, Kirkpatrick AW, et al. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med [Internet] 2012.:38.. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2513-4. DOI: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lichtenstein DA, Meziere GA. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest. 2008;;134((1):):117––125.. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2800. DOI: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lichtenstein D, Mauriat P. Lung ultrasound in the critically ill neonate. Curr Pediatr Rev [Internet] 2012;;8((3).) doi: 10.2174/157339612802139389. DOI: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources