Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Dec;27(6):946-955.
doi: 10.1177/1526602820948240. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

Three-Year Results of the IN.PACT SFA Japan Trial Comparing Drug-Coated Balloons With Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Three-Year Results of the IN.PACT SFA Japan Trial Comparing Drug-Coated Balloons With Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty

Yoshimitsu Soga et al. J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the 3-year safety and effectiveness of the MDT-2113 (IN.PACT Admiral) drug-coated balloon (DCB) vs percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in a Japanese population with femoropopliteal occlusive disease.

Materials and methods: The multicenter, prospective, IN.PACT SFA Japan randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01947478) was an independently adjudicated study evaluating Japanese participants randomized 2:1 to DCB (n=68) or PTA (n=32). The effectiveness endpoint was primary patency through 36 months, defined as freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and freedom from restenosis (by duplex ultrasound). The effectiveness endpoint was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method; estimates are presented with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The safety composite endpoint was freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days and freedom from major target limb amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization through 36 months.

Results: Primary patency by Kaplan-Meier estimate was higher in the DCB group (68.9%, 95% CI 57.5% to 80.2%) vs the PTA group (46.9%, 95% CI 29.6% to 64.2%) at 36 months (log-rank p=0.001). The CD-TLR rates were 14.9% (10/67) for the DCB group and 20.7% (6/29) for PTA (p=0.554). The safety composite endpoint occurred in 83.6% (56/67) of DCB participants and 75.9% (22/29) of PTA participants (p=0.402). All-cause death was similar between groups at 36 months [DCB 6.0% (4/67) vs PTA 6.9% (2/29), p>0.999), with no device- or procedure-related deaths in either group.

Conclusion: The final report of the IN.PACT SFA Japan trial showed that the IN.PACT Admiral DCB is safe and had durable outcomes through 3 years in Japanese participants with femoropopliteal occlusive disease.

Keywords: amputation; balloon angioplasty; drug-coated balloon; femoropopliteal segment; mortality; restenosis; target lesion revascularization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Hong Wang and Hiroko Ookubo are full-time employees of Medtronic. Michael R. Jaff is a compensated advisor for Biotronix, Medtronic, Philips/Spectranetics, Sanofi, and Vactronix and is an equity investor of PQ Bypass.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Participant flow in the MDT-2113 SFA Japan trial through 36 months. Values for death, lost to follow-up, and withdrew consent are cumulative; other exits were due to progressive dementia and PTA for other disease. Compliance rates include follow-up completed in and outside of the follow-up window. DCB, drug-coated balloon; PTA, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; SFA, superficial femoral artery.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier analyses of (A) primary patency and (B) freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) through 36 months. Bars represent the 95% confidence intervals. DCB, drug-coated balloon; PTA, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

References

    1. Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1465–1508. - PubMed
    1. Bailey SR, Beckman JA, Dao TD, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI/SIR/SVM 2018 appropriate use criteria for peripheral artery intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, and Society for Vascular Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73:214–237. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feldman DN, Armstrong EJ, Aronow HD, et al. SCAI consensus guidelines for device selection in femoral-popliteal arterial interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;92:124–140. - PubMed
    1. Tepe G, Laird J, Schneider P, et al. Drug-coated balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of superficial femoral and popliteal peripheral artery disease: 12-month results from the IN.PACT SFA randomized trial. Circulation. 2015;131:495–502. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laird JR, Schneider PA, Tepe G, et al. Durability of treatment effect using a drug-coated balloon for femoropopliteal lesions: 24-month results of IN.PACT SFA. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2329–2338. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data