Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1988 Jun;170(6):2549-54.
doi: 10.1128/jb.170.6.2549-2554.1988.

Perturbed chromosomal replication in recA mutants of Escherichia coli

Affiliations

Perturbed chromosomal replication in recA mutants of Escherichia coli

K Skarstad et al. J Bacteriol. 1988 Jun.

Abstract

When initiation of DNA replication is inhibited in wild-type Escherichia coli cells by rifampin or chloramphenicol, completion of ongoing rounds of replication (runout of replication) leads to cells containing two, four, or eight fully replicated chromosomes, as measured by flow cytometry. In recombination-deficient recA strains, a high frequency of cells with three, five, six, or seven fully replicated chromosomes was observed in addition to cells with two, four, or eight chromosomes. recA mutants affected only in the protease-stimulating function behaved like wild-type cells. Thus, in the absence of the recombinase function of RecA protein, the frequency of productive initiations was significantly reduced compared with that in its presence. DNA degradation during runout of replication in the presence of rifampin was about 15%. The DNA degradation necessary to account for the whole effect described above was in this range or even lower. However, a model involving selective and complete degradation of partially replicated chromosomes is considered unlikely. It is suggested that the lack of RecA protein causes initiations or newly formed replication forks to stall but remain reactivatable for a period of time by functional RecA protein.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Mol Biol. 1968 Feb 14;31(3):519-40 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1985 Aug;163(2):661-8 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1969 Oct;100(1):231-9 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Biol. 1972 Feb 28;64(1):47-60 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1972 Oct;112(1):7-12 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources