Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 31;15(8):e0238141.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238141. eCollection 2020.

Academic dishonesty among university students: The roles of the psychopathy, motivation, and self-efficacy

Affiliations

Academic dishonesty among university students: The roles of the psychopathy, motivation, and self-efficacy

Lidia Baran et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Academic dishonesty is a common problem at universities around the world, leading to undesirable consequences for both students and the education system. To effectively address this problem, it is necessary to identify specific predispositions that promote cheating. In Polish undergraduate students (N = 390), we examined the role of psychopathy, achievement goals, and self-efficacy as predictors of academic dishonesty. We found that the disinhibition aspect of psychopathy and mastery-goal orientation predicted the frequency of students' academic dishonesty and mastery-goal orientation mediated the relationship between the disinhibition and meanness aspects of psychopathy and dishonesty. Furthermore, general self-efficacy moderated the indirect effect of disinhibition on academic dishonesty through mastery-goal orientation. The practical implications of the study include the identification of risk factors and potential mechanisms leading to students' dishonest behavior that can be used to plan personalized interventions to prevent or deal with academic dishonesty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Faucher D, Caves S. Academic dishonesty: Innovative cheating techniques and the detection and prevention of them. Teach Learn Nurs. 2009;4: 37–41.
    1. Ternes M, Babin C, Woodworth A, Stephens S. Academic misconduct: An examination of its association with the dark triad and antisocial behavior. Pers Individ Dif. 2019;138: 75–78.
    1. Trost K. Psst, have you ever cheated?: A study of academic dishonesty in Sweden. Assess Eval High Edu. 2009;34: 367–376.
    1. Brimble M, Stevenson-Clarke P. Perceptions of the prevalence and seriousness of academic dishonesty in Australian universities. Aust Educ Res. 2005;32: 19–44.
    1. Patrzek J, Sattler S, van Veen F, Grunschel C, Fries S. Investigating the effect of academic procrastination on the frequency and variety of academic misconduct: a panel study. Stud High Educ. 2015;40: 1014–1029.

Publication types

MeSH terms