Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 9;62(2):e97-e111.
doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa119.

Ageism in Working Life: A Scoping Review on Discursive Approaches

Federica Previtali  1   2 , Katri Keskinen  1   2 , Miira Niska  1 , Pirjo Nikander  2   3
Affiliations

Ageism in Working Life: A Scoping Review on Discursive Approaches

Federica Previtali et al. Gerontologist. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: This review investigates the contribution of discursive approaches to the study of ageism in working life. It looks back on the 50 years of research on ageism and the body of research produced by the discursive turn in social science and gerontology.

Research design and methods: This study followed the 5-step scoping review protocol to define gaps in the knowledge on ageism in working life from a discursive perspective. About 851 papers were extracted from electronic databases and, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 39 papers were included in the final review.

Results: The selected articles were based on discursive approaches and included study participants along the full continuum of working life (workers, retirees, jobseekers, and students in training). Three main themes representing the focal point of research were identified, namely, experiences of ageism, social construction of age and ageism, and strategies to tackle (dilute) ageism.

Discussion and implications: Discursive research provides undeniable insights into how participants experience ageism in working life, how ageism is constructed, and how workers create context-based strategies to counteract age stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination. Discursive research on ageism in the working life needs further development about the variety of methods and data, the problematization of age-based labeling and grouping of workers, and a focus on the intersection between age and other social categories. Further research in these areas can deepen our understanding of how age and ageism are constructed and can inform policies about ways of disentangling them in working life.

Keywords: Aging policies; Discourses; Older–younger workers; Workforce.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of the screening process.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Description of themes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Allen, M. W., Armstrong, D. J., Riemenschneider, C. K., & Reid, M. F. (2006). Making sense of the barriers women face in the information technology work force: Standpoint theory, self-disclosure, and causal maps. Sex Roles, 54(11–12), 831–844. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9049-4 - DOI
    1. Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616 - DOI
    1. Aronsson, K. (1997). Age in social interaction. On constructivist epistemologies and the social psychology of language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 49–56. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.1997 - DOI
    1. Ben-Harush, A., Shiovitz-Ezra, S., Doron, I., Alon, S., Leibovitz, A., Golander, H., Haron, Y., & Ayalon, L. (2017). Ageism among physicians, nurses, and social workers: Findings from a qualitative study. European Journal of Ageing, 14(1), 39–48. doi:10.1007/s10433-016-0389-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berger, E. D. (2006), “Aging” identities: Degradation and negotiation in the search for employment. Journal of Ageing Studies, 20(4), 303–316. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2005.11.002 - DOI

Publication types