Comparative evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays in India
- PMID: 32866811
- PMCID: PMC7444492
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104609
Comparative evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays in India
Abstract
Introduction: IgG immunoassays have been developed and used widely for clinical samples and serosurveys for SARS-CoV2, with most detecting antibodies against the spike/receptor-binding-domain or nucleocapsid. Limited information is available on comparative evaluation of IgG immunoassays against a clinical reference standard, i.e., RT-PCR positivity with >20 days of illness. This study addresses the need for comparing clinical performance of IgG immunoassays with respect to this alternate reference standard.
Methods: We compared the performance of three immunoassays, an in-house RBD assay, and two commercial assays, the Diasorin LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S1 IgG CLIA which detects antibodies against S1/S2 domains of the Spike protein and the Zydus Kavach assay based on inactivated virus using a well-characterized panel of sera. 379 sera and plasma samples from RTPCR positive individuals >20 days of illness in symptomatic or RT-PCR positivity in asymptomatic individuals and 184 samples collected prior to 2019 were used for assay evaluation.
Results: The sensitivity of the assays were 84.7 (95 %CI 80.6-88.1), 82.6 (95 %CI 78.3-86.2) and 75.7 (95 %CI 71.0-79.9) respectively for RBD, LIAISON and Kavach. Kavach and the in-house RBD ELISA showed a specificity of 99.5 % and 100 %, respectively. The RBD and LIAISON (S1/S2) assays showed high agreement (94.7 %; 95 %CI: 92.0, 96.6) and were able to correctly identify more positive sera/plasma than Kavach.
Conclusion: Independent comparisons support the evaluation of performance characteristics of immunoassays. All three assays are suitable for serosurveillance studies, but in low prevalence sites, estimation of exposure may require adjustment based on our findings.
Keywords: Immunoassay; LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S1 IgG; RBD IgG ELISA; SARS-CoV-2; Serology; Zydus Kavach.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Clinical and Analytical Performance of an Automated Serological Test That Identifies S1/S2-Neutralizing IgG in COVID-19 Patients Semiquantitatively.J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Aug 24;58(9):e01224-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01224-20. Print 2020 Aug 24. J Clin Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 32580948 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 through the evaluation of three immunoassays: Two automated immunoassays (Euroimmun and Abbott) and one rapid lateral flow immunoassay (NG Biotech).J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104511. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104511. Epub 2020 Jun 15. J Clin Virol. 2020. PMID: 32593133 Free PMC article.
-
Brief clinical evaluation of six high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody assays.J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104480. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104480. Epub 2020 Jun 1. J Clin Virol. 2020. PMID: 32505777 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic performance of COVID-19 serology assays.Malays J Pathol. 2020 Apr;42(1):13-21. Malays J Pathol. 2020. PMID: 32342927 Review.
-
[The prevalence rate of anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG is 1.2% - Screening in asymptomatic outpatients in Germany (Northrhine-Westfalia)].MMW Fortschr Med. 2020 Aug;162(14):44-46. doi: 10.1007/s15006-020-0750-y. MMW Fortschr Med. 2020. PMID: 32780376 Free PMC article. Review. German.
Cited by
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the sensitivity of antibody tests for the laboratory confirmation of COVID-19.Future Virol. 2021 Nov:10.2217/fvl-2021-0211. doi: 10.2217/fvl-2021-0211. Epub 2021 Dec 15. Future Virol. 2021. PMID: 34950219 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36394900 Free PMC article.
-
Resolution of viral load in mild COVID-19 patients is associated with both innate and adaptive immune responses.J Clin Virol. 2022 Jan;146:105060. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105060. Epub 2021 Dec 21. J Clin Virol. 2022. PMID: 34971849 Free PMC article.
-
Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test.Indian J Med Res. 2021 May;153(5&6):658-664. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_3806_20. Indian J Med Res. 2021. PMID: 34145085 Free PMC article.
-
A Prospective Study on Rapidly Declining SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibodies Within One to Three Months of Testing IgG Positive: Can It Lead to Potential Reinfections?Cureus. 2020 Dec 2;12(12):e11845. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11845. Cureus. 2020. PMID: 33282604 Free PMC article.
References
-
- SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic pipeline, FIND. https://www.finddx.org/covid-19/pipeline/ (accessed August 8, 2020).
-
- Strategy for COVID-19 testing in India. https://www.icmr.gov.in/pdf/covid/strategy/Testing_Strategy_v5_18052020.pdf (accessed August 7, 2020).
-
- SOP_Specimen_Collection_2019-nCoV.pdf. https://niv.co.in/SOP_Specimen_Collection_2019-nCoV.pdf (accessed August 7, 2020).
-
- Target Product Profile: enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) Antibody tests to help determine if people have antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/how-tests-and-testing-kits-fo... (accessed August 7, 2020).
-
- Public Health England Porton Down, Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of four commercially available SARS-CoV-2 antibody immunoassays, Public Health England, Porton Down Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa... (accessed August 7, 2020).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous