The Management of Myelomeningocele Study: Short-Term Neonatal Outcomes
- PMID: 32866951
- PMCID: PMC7845433
- DOI: 10.1159/000509245
The Management of Myelomeningocele Study: Short-Term Neonatal Outcomes
Abstract
Introduction: The Management of Myelomeningocele Study was a multicenter randomized trial to compare prenatal and standard postnatal repair of myelomeningocele (MMC). Neonatal outcome data for 158 of the 183 randomized women were published in The New England Journal of Medicine in 2011.
Objective: Neonatal outcomes for the complete trial cohort (N = 183) are presented outlining the similarities with the original report and describing the impact of gestational age as a mediator.
Methods: Gestational age, neonatal characteristics at delivery, and outcomes including common complications of prematurity were assessed.
Results: Analysis of the complete cohort confirmed the initial findings that prenatal surgery was associated with an increased risk for earlier gestational age at birth. Delivery occurred before 30 weeks of gestation in 11% of neonates that had fetal MMC repair. Adverse pulmonary sequelae were rare in the prenatal surgery group despite an increased rate of oligohydramnios. There was no significant difference in other complications of prematurity including patent ductus arteriosus, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, periventricular leukomalacia, and intraventricular hemorrhage.
Conclusion: The benefits of prenatal surgery outweigh the complications of prematurity.
Keywords: Myelomeningocele; Neonatal outcome; Prenatal surgery; Preterm delivery.
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest and no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
References
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG committee opinion no. 550: maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:218–9. - PubMed
-
- Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics Practice bulletin no. 187: neural tube defects. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130((6)):e279–90. - PubMed