Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 27;21(17):6193.
doi: 10.3390/ijms21176193.

Specific Receptors for the Chemokines CXCR2 and CXCR4 in Pancreatic Cancer

Affiliations

Specific Receptors for the Chemokines CXCR2 and CXCR4 in Pancreatic Cancer

Ala Litman-Zawadzka et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Background: The mortality rate of pancreatic cancer (PC) is equal to its incidence and the majority of PC patients die within a few months of diagnosis. Therefore, a search for new biomarkers useful in the diagnosis and prognosis of PC is ongoing.

Objectives: The aim of our study was to compare the utility of CXCR2 and CXCR4 in the diagnosis and prediction of PC with classical tumor marker (carcinoembryonic antigen, CEA) and marker of inflammation-C-reactive protein (CRP).

Patients and methods: The study comprised 64 subjects - 32 PC patients and 32 healthy volunteers. Serum concentrations of tested proteins were analysed using immunological methods.

Results: Serum CXCR2 and CXCR4 concentrations, similarly to those of CEA and CRP, were significantly elevated in PC patients compared to healthy controls. Moreover, concentrations of CXCR4 were significantly correlated with CXCR2 and CRP levels, while CRP concentrations were correlated with CXCR2 and CEA levels. The diagnostic sensitivity and the predictive value for negative (PV-ve) results for CXCR4 were similar to those of CEA and higher than those of CXCR2 and CRP, while the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for CXCR4 was the highest among all tested proteins (CXCR2, CEA, CRP). Moreover, serum CXCR2 was found to be a significant predictor of PC risk.

Conclusions: CXCR4 is a better candidate for a tumor marker than CXCR2 in the diagnosis of PC, while serum CXCR2 is a significant predictor of PC risk.

Keywords: biomarker; pancreatic cancer; receptors for chemokines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

BM has received consultation and/or lecture honoraria from Abbott, Wiener, Roche, Cormay and Biameditek; MŁZ has received consultation and/or lecture honoraria from Roche.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The percentage of elevated concentrations of CXCR4 and CXCR-2, well-established tumor marker (CEA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Areas under ROC curves (AUC) for CXCR4 (0.8496, p < 0.001), receptor CXCR2 (0.7373, p = 0.002), CEA (0.7539, p < 0.001), CRP (0.8013, p < 0.001) in pancreatic cancer patients.

References

    1. Raman D., Baugher P.J., Thu Y.M., Richmond A. Role of chemokines in tumor growth. Cancer Lett. 2007;256:137–165. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.05.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shrivastava M.S., Hussain Z., Giricz O., Shenoy N., Polineni R., Maitra A., Verma A.K. Targeting chemokine pathways in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cell Cycle. 2014;13:3320–3327. doi: 10.4161/15384101.2014.968426. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rot A., von Andrian U.H. Chemokines in innate and adaptive host defense: Basic chemokinese grammar for immune cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2004;22:891–928. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104543. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balkwill F., Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: Back to Virchow? Lancet. 2001;357:539–545. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04046-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang J., Liu C., Mo X., Shi H., Li S. Mechanisms by which CXCR4/CXCL12 cause metastatic behavior in pancreatic cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2018;15:1771–1776. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7512. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms