Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug 27;9(9):1978.
doi: 10.3390/cells9091978.

Modeling Cancer Using Zebrafish Xenografts: Drawbacks for Mimicking the Human Microenvironment

Affiliations
Review

Modeling Cancer Using Zebrafish Xenografts: Drawbacks for Mimicking the Human Microenvironment

Pablo Cabezas-Sáinz et al. Cells. .

Abstract

The first steps towards establishing xenografts in zebrafish embryos were performed by Lee et al., 2005 and Haldi et al., 2006, paving the way for studying human cancers using this animal species. Since then, the xenograft technique has been improved in different ways, ranging from optimizing the best temperature for xenografted embryo incubation, testing different sites for injection of human tumor cells, and even developing tools to study how the host interacts with the injected cells. Nonetheless, a standard protocol for performing xenografts has not been adopted across laboratories, and further research on the temperature, microenvironment of the tumor or the cell-host interactions inside of the embryo during xenografting is still needed. As a consequence, current non-uniform conditions could be affecting experimental results in terms of cell proliferation, invasion, or metastasis; or even overestimating the effects of some chemotherapeutic drugs on xenografted cells. In this review, we highlight and raise awareness regarding the different aspects of xenografting that need to be improved in order to mimic, in a more efficient way, the human tumor microenvironment, resulting in more robust and accurate in vivo results.

Keywords: Zebrafish; cancer; chemotherapy; microenvironment; temperature; xenograft.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest and nothing to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative image of the main injection sites.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic representation of the drawbacks of the xenograft technique and future perspectives and fields of application.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Munkley J., Elliott D.J. Hallmarks of glycosylation in cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:35478. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8155. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu Q., Zhang H., Jiang X., Qian C., Liu Z., Luo D. Factors involved in cancer metastasis: A better understanding to “seed and soil” hypothesis. Mol. Cancer. 2017;16:176. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0742-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Massagué J., Obenauf A.C. Metastatic colonization by circulating tumour cells. Nature. 2016;529:298–306. doi: 10.1038/nature17038. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang J., Antin P., Berx G., Blanpain C., Brabletz T., Bronner M., Campbell K., Cano A., Casanova J., Christofori G., et al. Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;21:341–352. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0237-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fidler I.J. The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: The ‘seed and soil’ hypothesis revisited. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2003;3:453–458. doi: 10.1038/nrc1098. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types