Scalp reconstruction: A 10-year experience
- PMID: 32867413
- PMCID: PMC7463122
- DOI: 10.7181/acfs.2020.00269
Scalp reconstruction: A 10-year experience
Abstract
Background: The scalp is an important functional and aesthetic structure that protects the cranial bone. Due to its inelastic characteristics, soft-tissue defects of the scalp make reconstruction surgery difficult. This study aims to provide an improved scalp reconstruction decision making algorithm for surgeons.
Methods: This study examined patients who underwent scalp reconstruction within the last 10 years. The study evaluated several factors that surgeons use to select a given reconstruction method such as etiology, defect location, size, depth, and complications. An algorithmic approach was then suggested based on an analysis of these factors.
Results: Ninety-four patients were selected in total and 98 cases, including revision surgery, were performed for scalp reconstruction. Scalp reconstruction was performed by primary closure (36.73%), skin graft (27.55%), local flap (17.34%), pedicled regional flap (15.30%), and free flap (3.06%). The ratio of primary closure to more complex procedure on loose scalps (51.11%) was significantly higher than on tight scalps (24.52%) (p= 0.011). The choice of scalp reconstruction method was affected significantly by the defect size (R = 0.479, p< 0.001) and depth (p< 0.001). There were five major complications which were three cases of flap necrosis and two cases of skin necrosis. Hematoma was the most common of the 29 minor complications reported, followed by skin necrosis.
Conclusion: There are multiple factors affecting the choice of scalp reconstruction method. We suggest an algorithm based on 10 years of experience that will help surgeons establish successful surgical management for their patients.
Keywords: Radiotherapy; Reconstructive surgical procedures; Scalp.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures



Similar articles
-
An algorithm for one-stage malignant oncologic scalp reconstruction.Ann Transl Med. 2020 Apr;8(7):432. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.221. Ann Transl Med. 2020. PMID: 32395476 Free PMC article.
-
A Standard Algorithm for Reconstruction of Scalp Defects With Simultaneous Free Flaps in an Interdisciplinary Two-Team Approach.Front Oncol. 2019 Oct 25;9:1130. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01130. eCollection 2019. Front Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31709189 Free PMC article.
-
Bi-pedicled Visor Flap for Coverage of Two Skull Defects: A Practical Flap Option for Metastatic Scalp Lesions With a Favorable Cosmetic Outcome.Cureus. 2023 Jun 12;15(6):e40319. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40319. eCollection 2023 Jun. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37448410 Free PMC article.
-
Scalp and Forehead Reconstruction.Semin Plast Surg. 2018 May;32(2):90-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1642638. Epub 2018 May 14. Semin Plast Surg. 2018. PMID: 29765273 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Facial Skin Cancer Reconstruction.Semin Plast Surg. 2016 Aug;30(3):108-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584821. Semin Plast Surg. 2016. PMID: 27478419 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Latissimus Dorsi Free Flap: Subfascial Flap Dissection in a Case of Scalp and Forehead Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Nov 5;12(11):e6276. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006276. eCollection 2024 Nov. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024. PMID: 39507309 Free PMC article.
-
Scalp reconstruction using the reverse temporalis muscle flap: a case report.Arch Craniofac Surg. 2022 Jun;23(3):134-138. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2022.00199. Epub 2022 Jun 20. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2022. PMID: 35811346 Free PMC article.
-
An algorithmic approach of reconstruction for cranioplasty failure: A case series.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Feb 22;102(8):e33011. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033011. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. PMID: 36827034 Free PMC article.
-
Extensive scalp soft-tissue reconstruction with free flaps: A simplified therapeutic algorithm for donor site selection based on a retrospective analysis.JPRAS Open. 2024 Nov 17;43:205-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.11.003. eCollection 2025 Mar. JPRAS Open. 2024. PMID: 39758214 Free PMC article.
-
Novosorb® BTM- history, production and application in challenging wounds.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Nov 13;12:1450973. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1450973. eCollection 2024. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024. PMID: 39634098 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Desai SC, Sand JP, Sharon JD, Branham G, Nussenbaum B. Scalp reconstruction: an algorithmic approach and systematic review. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015;17:56–66. - PubMed
-
- Leedy JE, Janis JE, Rohrich RJ. Reconstruction of acquired scalp defects: an algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:54e–72e. - PubMed
-
- Newman MI, Hanasono MM, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ. Scalp reconstruction: a 15-year experience. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:501–6. - PubMed
-
- Steiner D, Hubertus A, Arkudas A, Taeger CD, Ludolph I, Boos AM, et al. Scalp reconstruction: a 10-year retrospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45:319–24. - PubMed
-
- Temple CL, Ross DC. Scalp and forehead reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2005;32:377–90. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources