Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation
- PMID: 32867753
- PMCID: PMC7461257
- DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-00524-z
Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation
Abstract
Background: Our human societies and certainly also (bio) medicine are more and more permeated with technology. There seems to be an increasing awareness among bioethicists that an effective and comprehensive approach to ethically guide these emerging biomedical innovations into society is needed. Such an approach has not been spelled out yet for bioethics, while there are frequent calls for ethical guidance of biomedical innovation, also by biomedical researchers themselves. New and emerging biotechnologies require anticipation of possible effects and implications, meaning the scope is not evaluative after a technology has been fully developed or about hypothetical technologies, but real-time for a real biotechnology.
Main text: In this paper we aim to substantiate and discuss six ingredients that we increasingly see adopted by ethicists and that together constitute "ethics parallel research". This approach allows to fulfil two aims: guiding the development process of technologies in biomedicine and providing input for the normative evaluation of such technologies. The six ingredients of ethics parallel research are: (1) disentangling wicked problems, (2) upstream or midstream ethical analysis, (3) ethics from within, (4) inclusion of empirical research, (5) public participation and (6) mapping societal impacts, including hard and soft impacts. We will draw on gene editing, organoid technology and artificial intelligence as examples to illustrate these six ingredients.
Conclusion: Ethics parallel research brings together these ingredients to ethically analyse and proactively or parallel guide technological development. It widens the roles and judgements from the ethicist to a more anticipatory and constructively guiding role. Ethics parallel research is characterised by a constructive, rather than a purely critical perspective, it focusses on developing best-practices rather than outlining worst practice, and draws on insights from social sciences and philosophy of technology.
Keywords: AI; Empirical ethics; Gene editing; Innovation; Medical ethics; Organoids; Society; Technology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Pursuing impact in research: towards an ethical approach.BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Apr 6;23(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00754-3. BMC Med Ethics. 2022. PMID: 35387625 Free PMC article.
-
Translational ethics: an analytical framework of translational movements between theory and practice and a sketch of a comprehensive approach.BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Sep 30;15:71. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-71. BMC Med Ethics. 2014. PMID: 25267434 Free PMC article.
-
Baiting bioethics.Ethics. 1986 Jan;96(2):356-74. doi: 10.1086/292753. Ethics. 1986. PMID: 11653693 Review.
-
A semantic exploration: Nurse ethicist, medical ethicist, or clinical ethicist: Do distinctions matter?Nurs Ethics. 2023 Aug;30(5):659-670. doi: 10.1177/09697330221146251. Nurs Ethics. 2023. PMID: 37946385
-
Don't blame the 'bio'--blame the 'ethics': varieties of (bio)ethics and the challenge of pluralism.J Bioeth Inq. 2005;2(1):10-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02448810. J Bioeth Inq. 2005. PMID: 16025604 Review.
Cited by
-
Developer perspectives on the ethics of AI-driven neural implants: a qualitative study.Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 3;14(1):7880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58535-4. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38570593 Free PMC article.
-
Ethics of research engagement with Deaf people. A qualitative evidence synthesis.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024 Sep 20;29(4):443-455. doi: 10.1093/jdsade/enae024. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024. PMID: 38879760 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Ethics of Stem Cell-Based Embryo-Like Structures : A Focus Group Study on the Perspectives of Dutch Professionals and Lay Citizens.J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Sep;21(3):513-542. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10325-9. Epub 2024 Mar 13. J Bioeth Inq. 2024. PMID: 38478325 Free PMC article.
-
Qualitative studies involving users of clinical neurotechnology: a scoping review.BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Aug 14;25(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01087-z. BMC Med Ethics. 2024. PMID: 39138452 Free PMC article.
-
Educating for Responsible Research Practice in Biomedical Sciences: Towards Learning Goals.Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(4):977-996. doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00295-y. Epub 2021 Nov 1. Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022. PMID: 34744313 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jonsen AR. The birth of bioethics. USA: Oxford University Press; 2003.
-
- Bijker WE. The vulnerability of technological culture. In: Nowotny H, editor. Cultures of technology and the quest for innovation. New York: Berghahn Books; 2006.
-
- Van de Poel I, Royakkers L. Ethics, technology, and engineering. Oxford: Wiley; 2011.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources