Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 31;20(1):810.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05646-z.

Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data

Róisín O'Donovan  1 , Eilish McAuliffe  2
Affiliations

Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data

Róisín O'Donovan et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Psychological safety allows healthcare professionals to take the interpersonal risks needed to engage in effective teamwork and to maintain patient safety. In order to improve psychological safety in healthcare teams, an in-depth understanding of the complex and nuanced nature of psychological safety is needed. Psychological safety concepts, including voice, silence, learning behaviour, support and familiarity, informed the current study's investigation of psychological safety. This study aims to use a mixed-methods approach to develop an in-depth understanding of psychological safety within healthcare teams and to build on this understanding to inform the development of future interventions to improve it.

Methods: Survey, observational and interview data are triangulated in order to develop an in- depth understanding of psychological safety within four healthcare teams, working within one case study hospital. The teams taking part included one multidisciplinary and three unidisciplinary teams. Observational and survey data were collected during and immediately following team meetings. Individual interviews were conducted with 31 individuals across the four teams. Thematic analysis was used to analyse these interviews.

Results: Survey results indicated a high level of psychological safety. However, observations and interviews captured examples of silence and situations where participants felt less psychologically safe. Findings from across all three data sources are discussed in relation to voice and silence, learning, familiarity and support.

Conclusion: The results of this study provide a detailed description and in-depth understanding of psychological safety within four healthcare teams. Based on this, recommendations are made for future research and the development of interventions to improve psychological safety.

Keywords: Healthcare teams; Mixed methods; Psychological safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Indicators of Psychological Safety Identified at the Team and Individual Levels. This figure illustrated the key findings coming from each data collection source. Positive and negative indicators of psychological safety are indicated in relation to voice, learning, support and familiarity
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44(2):350–383.
    1. Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC. Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J Organ Behav. 2006;27(7):941–966.
    1. Moore L, McAuliffe E. To report or not to report? Why some nurses are reluctant to whistleblow. Clin Gov Int J. 2012;17(4):332–342.
    1. Moore L, McAuliffe E. Is inadequate response to whistleblowing perpetuating a culture of silence in hospitals? Clin Gov Int J. 2010;15(3):166–178.
    1. Edmondson AC. Speaking up in the operating room: how team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J Manag Stud. 2003;40(6):1419–1452.

LinkOut - more resources