Comparison of Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition, version II and Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form in detecting nutritional risk among community-dwelling seniors in Bosnia and Herzegovina
- PMID: 32867881
- PMCID: PMC10195609
- DOI: 10.1017/S1368980020002438
Comparison of Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition, version II and Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form in detecting nutritional risk among community-dwelling seniors in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the current study is to compare Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition, version II (SCREEN II) and Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form (MNA-SF), where each is used to identify nutritional risk prevalence among community-dwelling people aged 65 years and above in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Design: A cross-sectional study. Nutritional risk assessed using the nutritionist's risk rating, anthropometric measurements, functional indicators, cognitive parameters, SCREEN II and MNA-SF.
Setting: The municipalities of Foca, East Sarajevo and Bijeljina, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Participants: Eight hundred twenty-one community-dwelling individuals aged ≥65 years.
Results: The prevalence of high nutritional risk per nutritionist's risk rating, SCREEN II and MNA-SF was 26, 60, and 7 %, respectively. With the nutritionist's rating score ≥5 as the criterion, the MNA-SF cut-off point of ≤11 (indicating any possible risk) had poor sensitivity (55·7 %), specificity (46·6 %) and AUC (0·563; P = 0·024). When the criterion of >7 was applied, good sensitivity (95·3 %) and specificity (88·9 %) were obtained for the MNA-SF cut-off score of ≤7. AUC for this comparison was 0·742 (considered fair). Cut-off points of <54 (AUC = 0·816) and <50 (AUC = 0·881) for SCREEN II (indicating moderate to high risk) corresponded with good sensitivity (82·2 %; 80·9 %) and fair specificity (72·1 %; 75·0 %).
Conclusion: MNA-SF may have a limited role in nutritional risk screening among community-dwelling seniors in Bosnia and Herzegovina. SCREEN II has promising results in regard to validity, but further studies are warranted.
Keywords: Community-dwelling seniors; Malnutrition; Nutrition risk assessment; Screening.
Figures
References
-
- Sobotka L (editor) (2012) Basics in Clinical Nutrition, 4th ed. Prague: Galen.
-
- Cederholm T, Barazzoni R & Austin P (2016) ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition. Clin Nutr 36, 49–64. - PubMed
-
- Guigoz Y (2006) The Mini nutritional assessment (MNA) review of the literature – what does it tell us? J Nutr Health Aging 10, 466–485. - PubMed
-
- Chang SF (2017) Frailty is a major related factor for at risk of malnutrition in community-dwelling older adults. J Nurs Scholarsh 49, 63–72. - PubMed
-
- Ehwerhemuepha L, Bendig D, Steele C et al. (2018) The effect of malnutrition on the risk of unplanned 7-day readmission in pediatrics. Hosp Pediatr 8, 7–13. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
