Is the flexion-abduction-supination magnetic resonance imaging view more accurate than standard magnetic resonance imaging in detecting distal biceps pathology?
- PMID: 32868013
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.05.014
Is the flexion-abduction-supination magnetic resonance imaging view more accurate than standard magnetic resonance imaging in detecting distal biceps pathology?
Abstract
Background and hypothesis: Partial biceps tendon pathology is difficult to diagnose. The flexion-abduction-supination (FABS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) view has been advocated to improve the accuracy of MRI investigation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the FABS view MRI in the diagnosis of distal biceps tendon pathology.
Methods: The study included 50 patients with surgically confirmed distal biceps tendon pathology and 50 patients with other elbow disorders. In both groups, standard elbow MRI (retrospective review of previously obtained MRI data) was performed in half of the patients whereas FABS views MRI were obtained in the other half. These were evaluated by 2 independent musculoskeletal radiologists. The sensitivity and specificity of both MRI views were determined. Tendinosis and grade of rupture were reported from MRI and then compared with surgical findings.
Results: There were no significant differences in sensitivity and specificity in detecting partial distal biceps injuries when the FABS view MRI (sensitivity, 84%; specificity, 86%) and standard MRI (sensitivity, 76%; specificity, 98%) were compared. The interobserver reliability was 92% for the FABS view MRI with biceps pathology and 68% for standard MRI. In the control group, the interobserver reliability was 88% for the FABS view MRI and 96% for standard MRI. FABS MRI was significantly better regarding grade of injury.
Conclusions: No significant differences in sensitivity and specificity were found between the FABS view and standard elbow MRI in the diagnosis of partial distal biceps tendon injuries, with high sensitivity and specificity for both views. Inter-rater reliability was better for FABS views, and FABS views were significantly more accurate than surgical findings in grading the extent of pathology.
Keywords: FABS; MRI; biceps; distal; elbow; partial; rupture; tendon.
Copyright © 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of clinical tests for partial distal biceps tendon ruptures and tendinitis.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Mar;31(3):532-536. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.012. Epub 2021 Nov 10. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022. PMID: 34774776
-
Utility of the FABS MRI sequence in the evaluation of distal biceps pathology.Skeletal Radiol. 2021 May;50(5):895-902. doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03633-3. Epub 2020 Oct 1. Skeletal Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33005977
-
Effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting partial and complete distal biceps tendon rupture.J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jan;35(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Nov 26. J Hand Surg Am. 2010. PMID: 19942363
-
Disorders of the distal biceps brachii tendon.Radiographics. 2005 Sep-Oct;25(5):1227-37. doi: 10.1148/rg.255045160. Radiographics. 2005. PMID: 16160108 Review.
-
MRI findings of chronic distal tendon biceps reconstruction and associated post-operative findings.Skeletal Radiol. 2021 Jun;50(6):1095-1109. doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03676-6. Epub 2020 Nov 24. Skeletal Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33236235 Review.
Cited by
-
Partial tear of the distal biceps tendon: Current concepts.J Orthop. 2022 May 3;32:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.05.002. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug. J Orthop. 2022. PMID: 35591898 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of MRI in Assessment of High-Grade Partial Distal Biceps Tears.Hand (N Y). 2025 Mar;20(2):291-295. doi: 10.1177/15589447231196906. Epub 2023 Sep 14. Hand (N Y). 2025. PMID: 37706458 Free PMC article.
-
Current concepts in the aetiology, assessment and management of partial distal biceps tendon tears.Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Apr 1;17(4):480-491. doi: 10.1177/17585732241245054. eCollection 2025 Jul. Shoulder Elbow. 2024. PMID: 39552651 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Acute Distal Biceps Tendon Injury: Diagnosis and Treatment.Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2023 Oct 30;58(5):e689-e697. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771488. eCollection 2023 Oct. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2023. PMID: 37908533 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the Ability of Hand Surgeons to Reliably Classify the Percentage of Tearing Based on MRI for Patients With a Partial Distal Biceps Tendon Tear.Hand (N Y). 2025 Jul 14:15589447251352005. doi: 10.1177/15589447251352005. Online ahead of print. Hand (N Y). 2025. PMID: 40654308 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical