A Natural Experiment to Evaluate the Nutritional Content of Restaurant Meal Purchases After Calorie Labeling
- PMID: 32868189
- PMCID: PMC7686154
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.06.006
A Natural Experiment to Evaluate the Nutritional Content of Restaurant Meal Purchases After Calorie Labeling
Abstract
Background: Calorie labeling is mandated in restaurant chains with ≥20 locations nationwide, but the effect of labeling on the nutritional quality of purchased meals in fast-food settings is unclear, especially for adolescents and children.
Objective: To estimate the effect of calorie menu labeling on the nutrient content and composition of fast-food meal purchases in McDonald's restaurants vs control restaurants.
Design: From 2010 to 2014, customers were sampled during repeated visits to McDonald's restaurants, which voluntarily labeled menus with calorie information in 2012, and 5 control fast-food restaurant chains that had not labeled their menus over the study period.
Participants/setting: Restaurant receipts and questionnaires were collected from 2883 adults, 2131 adolescents, and 433 children in 4 New England cities.
Main outcome measures: Saturated fat, sugar, sodium, and fiber content of purchased meals, as well as nutrient densities (ie, nutrient content adjusted for total calories), were calculated after linking purchases to nutrition data from restaurant websites.
Statistical analyses: Difference-in-differences analyses and linear mixed models were used to examine whether calorie labeling in McDonald's was associated with changes in nutrient content and nutrient density of purchased meals separately in adults, adolescents, and children.
Results: After implementation of calorie labeling at McDonald's, adult meals contained on average 4.0% fewer calories from sugar (95% confidence interval: -7.5 to -0.5), but 1.8% more calories from saturated fat (95% confidence interval: 0.7 to 2.9) compared with control chains. The fiber content of children's purchased meals was lower at McDonald's after calorie labeling (change = -1.4 g, 95% confidence interval: -2.5 to -0.3). Calorie labeling was not associated with changes in nutrient quality of adolescent meals.
Conclusions: Calorie labeling at McDonald's was associated with a possibly small positive change in the nutritional quality of meals in adults but not in adolescents or children. Efforts are needed to improve the nutritional quality of restaurant meals.
Keywords: Calorie labeling; Diet quality; Natural experiment; Nutrients; Obesity prevention.
Copyright © 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the impact of calorie labeling on McDonald's restaurant menus: a natural experiment.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 4;16(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0865-7. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019. PMID: 31684961 Free PMC article.
-
Consumers' estimation of calorie content at fast food restaurants: cross sectional observational study.BMJ. 2013 May 23;346:f2907. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2907. BMJ. 2013. PMID: 23704170 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in energy content of lunchtime purchases from fast food restaurants after introduction of calorie labelling: cross sectional customer surveys.BMJ. 2011 Jul 26;343:d4464. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4464. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21791497 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of Calorie Labeling and Modified Calorie Labeling Interventions: Impact on Consumer and Restaurant Behavior.Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Dec;25(12):2018-2044. doi: 10.1002/oby.21940. Epub 2017 Oct 17. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017. PMID: 29045080 Free PMC article.
-
Restaurant Menu Labeling Policy: Review of Evidence and Controversies.Curr Obes Rep. 2016 Mar;5(1):72-80. doi: 10.1007/s13679-016-0193-z. Curr Obes Rep. 2016. PMID: 26877095 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Calorie (energy) labelling for changing selection and consumption of food or alcohol.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 17;1(1):CD014845. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014845.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 39820897
-
US Consumer Identification of the Health Benefits of Dietary Fiber and Consideration of Fiber When Making Food Choices.Nutrients. 2022 Jun 3;14(11):2341. doi: 10.3390/nu14112341. Nutrients. 2022. PMID: 35684141 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of Prefecture-Level Yield of Not-for-Sale Vegetables on Vegetable Intake in Japan: A Natural Experiment.Nutrients. 2022 Jul 14;14(14):2884. doi: 10.3390/nu14142884. Nutrients. 2022. PMID: 35889839 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Quality Assessment of Five Bread Wheat and Five Barley Cultivars Grown in Romania.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 5;19(17):11114. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711114. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36078830 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Calories Purchased After Calorie Labeling of Prepared Foods in a Large Supermarket Chain.JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Sep 1;182(9):965-973. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.3065. JAMA Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 35913728 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Food and Drug Administration. Food Labeling; Nutrition Labeling of Standard Menu Items in Restaurants and Similar Retail Food Establishments; Extension of Compliance Date. In: Food and Drug Administration, ed. Vol 82 FR 20825: Federal Register; 2017:20825–20829. - PubMed
-
- Bollinger B, Leslie P, Sorensen A. Calorie Posting in Chain Restaurants. Am Econ J: Economic Policy. 2011;3(1):91–128.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical