Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May-Jun;88(3):390-398.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Aug 8.

Does size of the cochlear nerve affect postoperative auditory performance in pediatric cochlear implant patients with normal cochlear nerves?

Emine Deniz Gozen  1 , H Murat Yener  2 , Halide Kara  3 , Ahmet Atas  3 , Osman Kizilkilic  4 , Harun Cansiz  2
Affiliations

Does size of the cochlear nerve affect postoperative auditory performance in pediatric cochlear implant patients with normal cochlear nerves?

Emine Deniz Gozen et al. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 May-Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Cochlear implantation is an effective treatment method for severe to profound hearing loss. Many factors that may influence cochlear implantation success have been explained in previous studies. Apart from those, minor differences in size of normal cochlear nerves may affect postoperative performance.

Objective: To investigate whether the minor differences in cochlear nerve size in normal cochlear nerves affect postoperative cochlear implant performance.

Methods: 30 pediatric prelingually deaf patients who were treated with cochlear implantation were included in this study. From the reconstructed parasagittal magnetic resonance images, the diameter and cross-sectional area of the cochlear nerve on the ipsilateral and contralateral side were measured. Auditory evaluations were performed 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following the first fitting. All the analysis was performed by using EARS®, evaluation of auditory responses to speech tool. Correlation between cochlear nerve diameter, cross-sectional area and postoperative auditory perception was analyzed to determine whether variation in cochlear nerve size contributes to postoperative auditory performance.

Results: The mean diameter of the cochlear nerve on the ipsilateral side was 718.4 μm (504.5 - 904.3 μm) and mean cross sectional area was 0.015 cm2 (0.012 - 0.018 cm2). On the contralateral side the mean cochlear nerve diameter was 714.4 μm (502.6 - 951.4 μm) and mean cross sectional area was 0.014 cm2 (0.011 - 0.019 cm2). The correlation between the diameter and cross-sectional area of the ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear nerve revealed no significance. Mean score at first month monosyllable-trochee-polysyllable test, MTP1, was 0.17 (0.08 - 0.33), at 6th month with 6 words test, 6th month MTP6 was 0.72 (0.39 - 1.0), at 6th month with 12 words, 6th month MTP 12 was 0.46 (0.17 - 0.75) and at 12th month with 12 words, 12th month MTP12 was 0.73 (0.25 - 1.0). There was no correlation between the monosyllable-trochee-polysyllable test, values at any time with the diameter of the ipsilateral cochlear nerve. However, the first month MTP, 6th month MTP6 and 12th month MTP12 correlated with the cross-sectional area of the ipsilateral cochlear nerve.

Conclusion: Measuring the cross sectional area of the normal- appearing cochlear nerve may give important prognostic knowledge on cochlear implant outcomes. In patients with a larger cross sectional area the auditory performance was better and faster. Although normal appearing, slight differences on cross sectional area of the cochlear nerve may affect performance. Measuring the size of the cochlear nerve on parasagittal magnetic resonance images may provide beneficial information on the postoperative rehabilitation process.

Keywords: Auditory perception; Cochlear implantation; Cochlear nerve morphology; Prelingual deafness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Figure 1
3D Multi-Planar Reformatting mode (3D MPR) in OsiriX site of the calculated diameter of the cochlear nerve.
Fig. 2
Figure 2
3D Multi-Planar Reformatting mode (3D MPR) in OsiriX site of the calculated diameter of the cochlear nerve.
Fig. 3
Figure 3
3D Multi-Planar Reformatting mode (3D MPR) in OsiriX site of the calculated diameter of the cochlear nerve.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hawker K., Ramirez-Inscoe J., Bishop D.V., Twomey T., O’Donoghue G.M., Moore D.R. Disproportionate language impairment in children using cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2008;29:467–471. - PubMed
    1. Ching T.Y., Crowe K., Martin V., Day J., Mahler N., Youn S., et al. Language development and everyday functioning of children with hearing loss assessed at 3 years of age. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010;12:124–131. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Black J., Hickson L., Black B., Perry C. Prognostic indicators in paediatric cochlear implant surgery: a systematic literature review. Cochlear Implants Int. 2011;12:67–93. - PubMed
    1. Boons T., Brokx J.P., Dhooge I., Frijns J.H., Peeraer L., Vermeulen A., et al. Predictors of spoken language development following pediatric cochlear implantation. Ear Hear. 2012;33:617–639. - PubMed
    1. Holt R.F., Beer J., Kronenberger W.G., Pisoni D.B., Lalonde K. Contribution of family environment to pediatric cochlear implant users’ speech and language outcomes: some preliminary findings. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012;55:848–864. - PMC - PubMed