Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;34(11):3055-3061.
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003808.

Positional Body Composition of Female Division I Collegiate Volleyball Players

Affiliations

Positional Body Composition of Female Division I Collegiate Volleyball Players

Katie L Bisch et al. J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Bisch, KL, Bosch, TA, Carbuhn, A, Stanforth, PR, Oliver, JM, Bach, CW, and Dengel, DR. Positional body composition of female division I collegiate volleyball players. J Strength Cond Res 34(11): 3055-3061, 2020-The primary study objective was to measure positional differences in total and regional body composition among female NCAA Division I collegiate volleyball players using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The secondary objective was to examine normative age curves for fat and lean mass (LM) variables. Ninety female volleyball players from 5 universities received a DXA scan. Athletes were categorized by position: middle blocker (MB = 31), outside hitter (OH = 32), setter (ST = 9), and Libero (LB = 18). Height, body mass, total and regional fat mass (FM), LM, bone mineral density (BMD), and abdominal visceral adipose tissue were measured by DXA. Body mass distribution ratios were calculated. The secondary age analysis included a subset of 153 DXA scans (n = 83, ages 18-21 years). Front row players (i.e., MB and OH) had significantly greater total and regional LM and BMD measures (p < 0.05, all), compared with non-front row players (i.e., LB and ST). Differences in total LM (p < 0.001) were significantly influenced by height. Front row players had consistently lower mass distribution ratios compared with non-front row players (p < 0.05, all). Lean mass index (LMI, p = 0.752) and FM index (FMI, p = 0.392) were not significantly different across ages. Back row players have greater relative upper body mass, whereas mass in front row players is more evenly distributed between the upper and lower body. Bone mineral density differences may be influenced by repeated impact of jumping during the attacking and blocking actions of front row players. Minimal changes in LMI and fluctuations in FMI can be expected across an athlete's career.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ackland TR, Lohman TG, Sundgot-Borgen J, et al. Current status of body composition assessment in sport. Sports Med 42: 227–249, 2012.
    1. Bell DR, Sanfilippo JL, Binkley N, Heiderscheit BC. Lean mass asymmetry influences force and power asymmetry during jumping in collegiate athletes. J Strength Cond Res 28: 884, 2014.
    1. Berg AH, Scherer PE. Adipose tissue, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease. Cir Res 96: 939–949, 2005.
    1. Bilsborough JC, Greenway K, Opar D, et al. The accuracy and precision of DXA for assessing body composition in team sport athletes. J Sports Sci 32: 1821–1828, 2014.
    1. Boileau RA, Horswill CA. Body Composition in Sports: Measurement and Applications for Weight Loss and Gain. Exercise and Sport Science. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2000. pp. 319–338.