Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;30(1):51-56.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.13250. Epub 2020 Sep 11.

3D Printed Teeth with Included Veneer Preparation Guide

Christian Höhne  1 , Tanja Rammler  1 , Marc Schmitter  1
Affiliations

3D Printed Teeth with Included Veneer Preparation Guide

Christian Höhne et al. J Prosthodont. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was the design, feasibility, and evaluation of a 3D printed tooth model with internal preparation for dental education in veneer preparation.

Material and methods: A tooth with two different colored layers for the crown and the preparation form was designed and printed by a stereolithographic printer. In a voluntary course, 40 third- to fifth-year dental students were trained with these printed teeth in the clinical course. They had the opportunity to prepare four 3D printed teeth with an integrated veneer preparation. During their studies, they used standardized model teeth. The students rated the advantage in a questionnaire according to German school grades (1 best to 6 worst). For reliability analysis, Cronbach's alpha was calculated. Significant differences between groups were calculated using the Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results: The production of the teeth was feasible and cost-effective. The overall mean rating of the printed teeth in the questionnaire was 1.8 ± 0.18. The students rated the learning results with the printed tooth as significantly better than the standard model tooth (mean 3.0 ± 0.86 vs. mean 2.1 ± 0.95; p < 0.001). The item "is a more suitable exercise option" in contrast to standard model teeth was evaluated with 1.9 ± 0.61. The item "the included preparation was clearly visible in color" was rated with 1.7 ± 0.71. "The tooth model illustrated visually an ideal preparation" was rated with 1.8 ± 0.65. Additionally, the students were interested in including more printed teeth into their studies (1.7 ± 0.86). In the open questions the students reported great benefits of this method.

Conclusions: The feasibility of this teaching concept was confirmed. The students favored working on the innovative 3D-teeth with internal veneer preparation, emphasizing the usefulness of this technique in dental education. The tooth enabled the students to control their preparation permanently on their own.

Keywords: 3D printing; CAD; CAM; additive manufacturing; clinical practice; dental education; printed tooth; rapid prototyping; stereolithography; student training; veneer preparation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mackenzie L: Tooth anatomy: a practical guide part 1: drawing posterior teeth. Dent Update 2017;44:697-712
    1. Mackenzie L: Tooth anatomy: a practical guide part 2: drawing anterior teeth. Dent Update 2017;44:821-832
    1. Garrett PH, Faraone KL, Patzelt SBM, et al: Comparison of dental students’ self-directed, faculty, and software-based assessments of dental anatomy wax-ups: a retrospective study. J Dent Educ 2015;79:1437-1444
    1. Kwon SR, Hernández M, Blanchette DR, et al: Effect of computer-assisted learning on students’ dental anatomy waxing performance. J Dent Educ 2015;79:1093-1100
    1. Gratton DG, Kwon SR, Blanchette DR, et al: Performance of two different digital evaluation systems used for assessing pre-clinical dental students' prosthodontic technical skills. Eur J Dent Educ 2017;21:252-260

LinkOut - more resources