Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;25(3):255-265.
doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02317-3. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

Insert devices for faecal incontinence

P How  1 , P M Trivedi  2 , P E Bearn  2 , G P Thomas  2
Affiliations

Insert devices for faecal incontinence

P How et al. Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Faecal incontinence (FI) affects 1-19% of the general population and carries significant physical and psychological morbidity. Treatment strategies vary greatly with respect to morbidity and efficacy and relatively little is known regarding the role of mechanical devices such as anal and vaginal inserts. This is an up-to-date systematic review of the use of these devices in the management of patients with FI.

Methods: A systematic electronic search was performed of the Medline, Pubmed and Embase databases using the key words and/or MeSH 'anal plug', 'anal insert', 'vaginal insert' and 'faecal incontinence'. Only articles that reported clinical outcomes for these devices for FI in the English language were included. Review articles were excluded to avoid duplication of data.

Results: Thirteen articles fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Two articles reported outcomes for the Eclipse vaginal insert and 11 articles reported on three types of anal inserts; the Coloplast 'Tulip' design (6), the Procon/ProTect device (2) and the Renew insert (3). When tolerated, both anal and vaginal inserts significantly improved continence, bowel function and quality of life where reported. Adverse effects included discomfort, leakage and slippage. Long-term compliance and benefit are yet to be determined.

Conclusions: Vaginal and anal inserts may be a useful treatment for FI. Better quality of evidence is needed to define its effectiveness.

Keywords: Anal; Faecal incontinence; Inserts; Review; Vaginal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Longstanding 'outlet challenge'.
    Maeda Y. Maeda Y. Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Mar;25(3):253-254. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02391-7. Tech Coloproctol. 2021. PMID: 33523327 No abstract available.

References

    1. Damon H, Guye O et al (2006) Prevalence of anal incontinence in adults and impact on quality-of-life. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 30:37–43 - DOI
    1. Sharma A, Tuan L, Marshall RJ et al (2016) Systematic review of the prevalence of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 103:1589–1597 - DOI
    1. Nelson R, Furner S, Jesudason V (1998) Faecal incontinence in Wisconsin nursing homes: prevalence and associations. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1226–1229 - DOI
    1. Shamseer L, Moher D et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 349:g7647 - DOI
    1. Mortensen N, Humphreys MS (1991) The anal continence plug: a disposable device for patients with anorectal incontinence. The Lancet 338(8762):295–297 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources