Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;57(12):e13679.
doi: 10.1111/psyp.13679. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

Startle during backward evaluative conditioning is not modulated by instructions

Luke J S Green  1 , Camilla C Luck  1 , Ottmar V Lipp  1
Affiliations

Startle during backward evaluative conditioning is not modulated by instructions

Luke J S Green et al. Psychophysiology. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Instructions highlighting that backward conditional stimuli (CSs) stop unconditional stimuli (USs) result in their acquiring valence opposite to that of the US on explicit measures of valence. We assessed whether such instructions would influence startle blink modulation in the same way. Two groups were presented with concurrent forward and backward evaluative conditioning (CS-US-CS) using cartoon aliens as CSs, and pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant sounds as USs. Startle magnitude was measured during conditioning and valence ratings were assessed after conditioning. Participants in the "start-stop" instructions group (n = 41) were instructed to learn whether CSs started or stopped US presentations, while participants in the "observe" instructions group (n = 41) were told to pay attention to the stimuli as they would be asked questions about them after the experiment. In the start-stop instructions group backward CSs paired with positive USs were rated as less pleasant than backward CSs paired with neutral and negative USs (contrast effect), whereas ratings of backward CSs did not differ in the observe instructions group. Startle magnitude was larger during backward CSs paired with positive USs in comparison to CSs paired with neutral or negative USs in both instruction groups. Startle blink modulation was unaffected by instructions, suggesting that startle indexes the emotional state at the time of probe presentation rather than CS valence based on propositional information about the function of the CS.

Keywords: Evaluative conditioning; attitudes; backward conditioning; propositional learning; startle blink; startle modulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Andreatta, M., Mühlberger, A., Glotzbach-Schoon, E., & Pauli, P. (2013). Pain predictability reverses valence ratings of a relief-associated stimulus. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7(53), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00053
    1. Andreatta, M., Mühlberger, A., Yarali, A., Gerber, B., & Pauli, P. (2010). A rift between implicit and explicit conditioned valence in human pain relief learning. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1692), 2411-2416. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0103.
    1. Andreatta, M., & Pauli, P. (2017). Learning mechanisms underlying threat absence and threat relief: Influences of trait anxiety. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 145, 105-113. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2017.09.005
    1. Blumenthal, T. D., Cuthbert, B. N., Filion, D. L., Hackley, S., Lipp, O. V., & Van Boxtel, A. (2005). Committee report: Guidelines for human startle eyeblink electromyographic studies. Psychophysiology, 42, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00271.x
    1. Bradley, M. M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (1990). Startle reflex modification: Emotion of attention? Psychophysiology, 27, 513-522. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb01966.x

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources