Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;68(1):60-74.
doi: 10.1002/jmrs.424. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

The effect of clinical information on radiology reporting: A systematic review

Chelsea Castillo  1   2 , Tom Steffens  2 , Lawrence Sim  1 , Liam Caffery  1
Affiliations

The effect of clinical information on radiology reporting: A systematic review

Chelsea Castillo et al. J Med Radiat Sci. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of clinical information on the accuracy, timeliness, reporting confidence and clinical relevance of the radiology report.

Methods: A systematic review of studies that investigated a link between primary communication of clinical information to the radiologist and the resultant report was conducted. Relevant studies were identified by a comprehensive search of electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE). Studies were screened using pre-defined criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies. Synthesis of findings was narrative. Results were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Results: There were 21 studies which met the inclusion criteria, of which 20 were included in our review following quality assessment. Sixteen studies investigated the effect of clinical information on reporting accuracy, three studies investigated the effect of clinical information on reporting confidence, three studies explored the impact of clinical information on clinical relevance, and two studies investigated the impact of clinical information on reporting timeliness. Some studies explored multiple outcomes. Studies concluded that clinical information improved interpretation accuracy, clinical relevance and reporting confidence; however, reporting time was not substantially affected by the addition of clinical information.

Conclusion: The findings of this review suggest clinical information has a positive impact on the radiology report. It is in the best interests of radiologists to communicate the importance of clinical information to reporting via the creation of criteria standards to guide the requesting practices of medical imaging referrers. Further work is recommended to establish these criteria standards.

Keywords: Radiology; clinical information; communication; report; request.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
JBI quality and risk of bias assessment scores.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists ® . Radiodiagnosis Training Program Curriculum. Sydney: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists®, 2014.
    1. ARPANSA . Radiation Protection Series No. 14. Commonwealth of Australia, Victoria, 2008.
    1. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists . Radiation Safety in Medical Imaging, Version 1.0. Radiation Safety in Medical Imaging [Internet]. 2015. 05 August 2017 [cited 2017 24 September]; 1.0. Available from: https://www.ranzcr.com/fellows/clinical‐radiology/professional‐documents...
    1. Loy CT, Irwig L. Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review. JAMA 2004; 292(13): 1602–9. - PubMed
    1. Zalis M, Harris M. Advanced search of the electronic medical record: augmenting safety and efficiency in radiology. JACR 2010; 7(8): 625–33. - PubMed

Publication types