Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 1;66(9):1156-1166.
doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa164.

Generic Protocols for the Analytical Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based ctDNA Assays: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the BloodPAC's Analytical Variables Working Group

Affiliations

Generic Protocols for the Analytical Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based ctDNA Assays: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the BloodPAC's Analytical Variables Working Group

James H Godsey et al. Clin Chem. .

Abstract

Liquid biopsy, particularly the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), has demonstrated considerable promise for numerous clinical intended uses. Successful validation and commercialization of novel ctDNA tests have the potential to improve the outcomes of patients with cancer. The goal of the Blood Profiling Atlas Consortium (BloodPAC) is to accelerate the development and validation of liquid biopsy assays that will be introduced into the clinic. To accomplish this goal, the BloodPAC conducts research in the following areas: Data Collection and Analysis within the BloodPAC Data Commons; Preanalytical Variables; Analytical Variables; Patient Context Variables; and Reimbursement. In this document, the BloodPAC's Analytical Variables Working Group (AV WG) attempts to define a set of generic analytical validation protocols tailored for ctDNA-based Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) assays. Analytical validation of ctDNA assays poses several unique challenges that primarily arise from the fact that very few tumor-derived DNA molecules may be present in circulation relative to the amount of nontumor-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA). These challenges include the exquisite level of sensitivity and specificity needed to detect ctDNA, the potential for false negatives in detecting these rare molecules, and the increased reliance on contrived samples to attain sufficient ctDNA for analytical validation. By addressing these unique challenges, the BloodPAC hopes to expedite sponsors' presubmission discussions with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with the protocols presented herein. By sharing best practices with the broader community, this work may also save the time and capacity of FDA reviewers through increased efficiency.

Keywords: NGS; analytical validation; cfDNA; ctDNA; liquid biopsy; plasma.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Stroun M, Anker P, Maurice P, Lyautey J, Lederrey C, Beljanski M, et al.Neoplastic characteristics of the DNA found in the plasma of cancer patients. Oncology 1989;46:318–22. - PubMed
    1. Mandel P, Metais P.. Les acides nucleiques du plasma sanguin chez l'homme C R. Seances Soc Biol Fil 1948;142:241–3. - PubMed
    1. Schwaederle M, Parker BA, Schwab RB, Fanta PT, Boles SG, Daniels GA, et al.Molecular tumor board: the University of California-San Diego Moores Cancer Center experience. Oncologist 2014;19:631–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lim C, Tsao MS, Le LW, Shepherd FA, Feld R, Burkes RL, et al.Biomarker testing and time to treatment decision in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2015;26:1415–21. - PubMed
    1. Overman MJ, Modak J, Kopetz S, Murthy R, Yao JC, Hicks ME, et al.Use of research biopsies in clinical trials: are risks and benefits adequately discussed? J Clin Oncol 2013;31:17–22. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types