Sirolimus versus cyclosporine for the treatment of pediatric chronic immune thrombocytopenia: A randomized blinded trial
- PMID: 32871473
- DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106895
Sirolimus versus cyclosporine for the treatment of pediatric chronic immune thrombocytopenia: A randomized blinded trial
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) of childhood is still a problem. For treating ITP, several immunosuppressive medications can be considered with various response rates. Our goal was to compare effects of sirolimus and cyclosporine on children with chronic ITP.
Methods: This randomized and blinded trial was carried out on 67 children over 5 years old with chronic ITP. Patients were assigned 1:1 to cyclosporine and sirolimus for 6 months. Platelet count was assessed and compared between 2 study groups at different intervals. The clinical trial registry number was IRCT20180501039499N1.
Results: Sixty-one children completed the 6-month treatment. Mean age was 9.3 years with an excess of females. Compared to baseline values, both drugs caused a significant increase in number of platelets over the course of treatment; sirolimus group: 15,800/mcL vs 96,566/mcL, (P < 0.001), cyclosporine group: 14,400/mcL vs 111,266/mcL, P < 0.001,). In addition, differences of platelet number were statistically significant at some treatment intervals (3rd and 6th month, P < 0.05). A quicker response was observed in children receiving cyclosporine. Both drugs had similar rate of response which occurred in 50% of included patients. Finally, sirolimus had a better safety profile.
Conclusions: Our study showed that cyclosporine and sirolimus had an equal rate of response in treating chronic ITP of children. At the same time, the two medications showed significant differences in their side effects.
Keywords: Chronic; Cyclosporine; ITP; Platelets; Sirolimous.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources