Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 28;17(17):6274.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176274.

How Did Distribution Patterns of Particulate Matter Air Pollution (PM2.5 and PM10) Change in China during the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Spatiotemporal Investigation at Chinese City-Level

Affiliations

How Did Distribution Patterns of Particulate Matter Air Pollution (PM2.5 and PM10) Change in China during the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Spatiotemporal Investigation at Chinese City-Level

Zhiyu Fan et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Due to the suspension of traffic mobility and industrial activities during the COVID-19, particulate matter (PM) pollution has decreased in China. However, rarely have research studies discussed the spatiotemporal pattern of this change and related influencing factors at city-scale across the nation. In this research, the clustering patterns of the decline rates of PM2.5 and PM10 during the period from 20 January to 8 April in 2020, compared with the same period of 2019, were investigated using spatial autocorrelation analysis. Four meteorological factors and two socioeconomic factors, i.e., the decline of intra-city mobility intensity (dIMI) representing the effect of traffic mobility and the decline rates of the secondary industrial output values (drSIOV), were adopted in the regression analysis. Then, multi-scale geographically weighted regression (MGWR), a model allowing the particular processing scale for each independent variable, was applied for investigating the relationship between PM pollution reductions and influencing factors. For comparison, ordinary least square (OLS) regression and the classic geographically weighted regression (GWR) were also performed. The research found that there were 16% and 20% reduction of PM2.5 and PM10 concentration across China and significant PM pollution mitigation in central, east, and south regions of China. As for the regression analysis results, MGWR outperformed the other two models, with R2 of 0.711 and 0.732 for PM2.5 and PM10, respectively. The results of MGWR revealed that the two socioeconomic factors had more significant impacts than meteorological factors. It showed that the reduction of traffic mobility caused more relative declines of PM2.5 in east China (e.g., cities in Jiangsu), while it caused more relative declines of PM10 in central China (e.g., cities in Henan). The reduction of industrial operation had a strong relationship with the PM10 drop in northeast China. The results are crucial for understanding how the decline pattern of PM pollution varied spatially during the COVID-19 outbreak, and it also provides a good reference for air pollution control in the future.

Keywords: COVID-19; PM pollution; influencing factors; multi-scale geographically weighted regression (MGWR); spatial correlation analysis; spatiotemporal patterns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Particulate matter (PM) ground observation sites distribution in China.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PM concentrations in Chinese prefectural cities of the study period in 2018 ((a) for PM2.5 and (d) for PM10); 2019 ((b) for PM2.5 and (e) for PM10); and 2020 ((c) for PM2.5 and (f) for PM10).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Temporal statistics. (a,b) The days proportion distribution of daily average PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations, respectively; (c,d) The hourly PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations change, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Decline rates of PM2.5 and PM10. (a,b) The drPM2.5 in 2018–2019 and 2019–2020, respectively. (c,d) The drPM10 in 2018–2019 and 2019–2020, respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Spatial clusters of drPM2.5 and drPM10. (a,b) The results of drPM2.5 in 2018–2019 and 2019–2020, respectively; (c,d) The results of drPM10 in 2018–2019 and 2019–2020, respectively.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Spatial coefficients of decline of intra-city mobility intensity (dIMI) ((a) for the PM2.5 model and (b) for the PM10 model), decline rates of the secondary industrial output values (drSIOV); ((c) for the PM2.5 model and (d) for the PM10 model) and dHUM; ((e) for the PM2.5 model and (f) for the PM10 model).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Qiao L., Cai J., Wang H., Wang W., Zhou M., Lou S., Chen R., Dai H., Chen C., Kan H. PM2.5Constituents and Hospital Emergency-Room Visits in Shanghai, China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48:10406–10414. doi: 10.1021/es501305k. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xu B., Lin B. Regional differences of pollution emissions in China: Contributing factors and mitigation strategies. J. Clean. Prod. 2016;112:1454–1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.067. - DOI
    1. Yan D., Lei Y., Shi Y., Zhu Q., Li L., Zhang Z. Evolution of the spatiotemporal pattern of PM2.5 concentrations in China—A case study from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Atmos. Environ. 2018;183:225–233. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.03.041. - DOI
    1. Janssen N.A.H., Schwartz J., Zanobetti A., Suh H.H. Air conditioning and source-specific particles as modifiers of the effect of PM(10) on hospital admissions for heart and lung disease. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002;110:43–49. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0211043. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lu F., Xu D., Cheng Y., Dong S., Guo C., Jiang X., Zheng X.-Y. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the adverse health effects of ambient PM2.5 and PM10 pollution in the Chinese population. Environ. Res. 2015;136:196–204. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.06.029. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types