Opiate antagonists and rewarding brain stimulation
- PMID: 3287237
- DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(88)80068-x
Opiate antagonists and rewarding brain stimulation
Abstract
This review examines the literature on the effects of opiate antagonists on brain stimulation (ICSS) reward. Antagonists should have predictable effects if endogenous opioids modulate ICSS. Naloxone is the antagonist most often used, and it has produced inconsistent results in some ICSS paradigms. When schedules of intermittent reinforcement are used, however, naloxone reliably reduces the rate of responding. It reverses the effects of opiate agonists on ICSS behavior, and it also attenuates the effects of psychomotor stimulants, such as amphetamine. The results produced by naloxone are consistent with a modulatory effect of endogenous opioid systems on reward, and suggest that the opiate and dopamine systems together exert significant control over ICSS. Further research is needed to characterize better the actions of the antagonists on ICSS behavior, and productive research directions are proposed. Data obtained in future studies might suggest how the endogenous opioid systems modulate both natural and brain stimulation reward.
Similar articles
-
In rats, acute morphine dependence results in antagonist-induced response suppression of intracranial self-stimulation.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Sep;175(3):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1829-3. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004. PMID: 15024547
-
[The influence of naloxone on the antinociceptive effects of the brain system of negative reinforcement in the developing rabbit].Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova. 1995 Dec;81(12):31-5. Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova. 1995. PMID: 8754025 Russian.
-
Route of administration affects the ability of naltrexone to reduce amphetamine-potentiated brain stimulation reward in rats.Addict Biol. 2009 Sep;14(4):408-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2009.00161.x. Epub 2009 Jun 1. Addict Biol. 2009. PMID: 19489752
-
Minireview. Benzodiazepine-opiate antagonist interactions in relation to feeding and drinking behavior.Life Sci. 1983 Mar 7;32(10):1043-51. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(83)90108-x. Life Sci. 1983. PMID: 6338330 Review.
-
Brain mechanisms of drug reward and euphoria.Psychiatr Med. 1985;3(4):445-60. Psychiatr Med. 1985. PMID: 2893431 Review.
Cited by
-
Norbinaltorphimine blocks the feeding but not the reinforcing effect of lateral hypothalamic electrical stimulation.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1993;111(3):345-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02244951. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1993. PMID: 7870973
-
The atypical antidepressant mirtazapine attenuates expression of morphine-induced place preference and motor sensitization.Brain Res. 2012 Sep 7;1472:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Jul 20. Brain Res. 2012. PMID: 22820297 Free PMC article.
-
In rats, acute morphine dependence results in antagonist-induced response suppression of intracranial self-stimulation.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Sep;175(3):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1829-3. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004. PMID: 15024547
-
A neuropeptide-centric view of psychostimulant addiction.Br J Pharmacol. 2008 May;154(2):343-57. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.133. Epub 2008 Apr 14. Br J Pharmacol. 2008. PMID: 18414383 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interactions of naloxone with morphine, amphetamine and phencyclidine on fixed interval responding for intracranial self-stimulation in rats.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1990;102(2):263-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02245931. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1990. PMID: 2274609
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources