Clinical significance of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and biochemical tests in the rapid diagnosis of gallstone-related pancreatitis: a prospective study
- PMID: 3287369
- DOI: 10.1097/00006676-198804000-00007
Clinical significance of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and biochemical tests in the rapid diagnosis of gallstone-related pancreatitis: a prospective study
Abstract
Real-time ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and biochemical tests were prospectively performed to detect gallstones in 88 consecutive patients immediately after the onset of an attack of acute pancreatitis. The sensitivity of biochemical tests was 84.6% when the patients had three or more positives of five parameters [including serum bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase (AP), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), alanine transaminase (ALT), and alanine transaminase-aspartate transaminase (ALT-AST) ratio]. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 71.8, 98.0, and 86.4% for US, and 52.9%, 100%, and 79.5% for CT. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were improved to 82.1, 100, and 93.2% by the combination of US and CT, and 94.9, 100, and 97.7% by the combination of US and biochemical tests. Adding CT to the combination of US and biochemical tests resulted in only a slight improvement in sensitivity and accuracy. In conclusion, a combination of US and biochemical tests can provide the best noninvasive method in rapidly detecting gallstones as an etiological factor in acute pancreatitis. Computed tomography is not cost-effective. A positive result of biochemical tests despite a negative finding in US calls for an intensive search for gallstones by further investigation with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography or repeated US examinations.
Similar articles
-
[Value of laboratory tests and echography in the diagnosis of biliary disease in the initial phase of acute pancreatitis].Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 1990;20(3):137-44. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 1990. PMID: 2095097 Spanish.
-
The urgent diagnosis of gallstones in acute pancreatitis: a prospective study of three methods.Br J Surg. 1984 Mar;71(3):230-3. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800710324. Br J Surg. 1984. PMID: 6141833
-
Prediction of common bile duct stones in the earliest stages of acute biliary pancreatitis.Endoscopy. 2011 Jan;43(1):8-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255866. Epub 2010 Oct 22. Endoscopy. 2011. PMID: 20972954
-
[Acute pancreatitis and gallstones].Ugeskr Laeger. 1993 Apr 26;155(17):1275-8. Ugeskr Laeger. 1993. PMID: 8506574 Review. Danish.
-
[Acute pancreatitis associated with biliary lithiasis].Presse Med. 1993 Jan 23;22(2):72-6. Presse Med. 1993. PMID: 7684137 Review. French.
Cited by
-
The clinical problem of biliary acute necrotizing pancreatitis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of biliary necrotizing pancreatitis.J Gastrointest Surg. 2001 May-Jun;5(3):235-9. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(01)80042-1. J Gastrointest Surg. 2001. PMID: 11419448 Review. No abstract available.
-
Usefulness of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-Related Procedures for Gallstone Pancreatitis.Cureus. 2024 Aug 18;16(8):e67133. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67133. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39161548 Free PMC article.
-
Consensus of primary care in acute pancreatitis in Japan.World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jun 7;12(21):3314-23. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i21.3314. World J Gastroenterol. 2006. PMID: 16733846 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic standards for acute pancreatitis.World J Surg. 1997 Feb;21(2):136-42. doi: 10.1007/s002689900205. World J Surg. 1997. PMID: 8995068 Review.
-
Biliary pancreatitis.J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct;10(8):1170-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.10.017. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006. PMID: 16966038 Review. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous