Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 1;3(1):480.
doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-1096-9.

Analysis of muntjac deer genome and chromatin architecture reveals rapid karyotype evolution

Affiliations

Analysis of muntjac deer genome and chromatin architecture reveals rapid karyotype evolution

Austin B Mudd et al. Commun Biol. .

Abstract

Closely related muntjac deer show striking karyotype differences. Here we describe chromosome-scale genome assemblies for Chinese and Indian muntjacs, Muntiacus reevesi (2n = 46) and Muntiacus muntjak vaginalis (2n = 6/7), and analyze their evolution and architecture. The genomes show extensive collinearity with each other and with other deer and cattle. We identified numerous fusion events unique to and shared by muntjacs relative to the cervid ancestor, confirming many cytogenetic observations with genome sequence. One of these M. muntjak fusions reversed an earlier fission in the cervid lineage. Comparative Hi-C analysis showed that the chromosome fusions on the M. muntjak lineage altered long-range, three-dimensional chromosome organization relative to M. reevesi in interphase nuclei including A/B compartment structure. This reshaping of multi-megabase contacts occurred without notable change in local chromatin compaction, even near fusion sites. A few genes involved in chromosome maintenance show evidence for rapid evolution, possibly associated with the dramatic changes in karyotype.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

D.S.R. is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of and a minor shareholder in Dovetail Genomics, which developed the Hi-C library preparation kit used in this study and performed quality control analyses on the Hi-C libraries. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Evolutionary and phylogenomic analyses.
a The phylogenetic tree of the five analyzed species, calculated from fourfold degenerate sites and divergence time confidence intervals, was visualized with FigTree (commit 901211e; https://github.com/rambaut/figtree). The ancestral karyotype at each node and the six branches with fission and fusion events relative to the ancestral karyotype were labeled on the tree. The lack of fissions or fusions on the R. tarandus-specific branch as well as the timings of the cervid-specific and B. taurus-specific fissions were derived from literature. b The alignment plot was generated with jcvi.graphics.karyotype (v0.8.12; https://github.com/tanghaibao/jcvi) using runs of collinearity containing at least 25 kb of aligned sequence between B. taurus, C. elaphus, M. reevesi, and M. muntjak. R. tarandus was excluded, as it is not a chromosome-scale assembly. Chromosomes that have been inverted in this image relative to their original assembly orientations are marked with asterisks. c Pairwise distances in substitutions per fourfold degenerate site extracted from the RAxML (v8.2.11) phylogenetic tree using Newick utilities (v1.6) were shown relative to the reference genome M. muntjak.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Chromosome Hi-C contact maps.
Visualization of M. muntjak (below the diagonal) and M. reevesi (above the diagonal) Hi-C contact maps in Juicebox (v1.11.08) using the M. muntjak assembly as the reference. Orange boxes demarcate the boundaries of the three M. muntjak chromosomes, which are ordered as in Fig. 1. Chromosome numbers are provided in the lower-left corner of each. The intensity of blue pixels is proportional to the contact frequency between x and y pairs of genomic loci. The highest intensity pixels are along the diagonal of each chromosome, indicating a high degree of contacts between loci in close proximity. The checker board/striped patterns near the diagonal reflect fewer contacts between neighboring loci and increased contacts between more distant loci due to the three-dimensional chromatin folding (i.e., A/B compartment) structure within nuclei. In the upper triangle, the step-like pattern of high-density contacts along the diagonal is a result of conserved collinearity between M. reevesi and M. muntjak chromosomes; however, six blocks of high-frequency contacts (black arrows) can be observed off the diagonal and reflect large structural differences resulting from chromosome fission and fusion events. Two inverted segments (gray arrows) can also be observed.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Evaluation of inter-chromosome contacts.
a Normalized 1 Mb intra-bin Hi-C contacts for M. muntjak (y-axis) vs. M. reevesi (x-axis) with the bins containing the M. muntjak lineage-specific fusion sites (Supplementary Table 7), chromosome ends, the X chromosome, the potential M. muntjak haplotype-specific duplication, and the potential M. muntjak haplotype-specific deletion colored. The expected result of conserved Hi-C contacts was represented with a dashed red line. For fusion site ranges spanning two bins, the bin containing the majority of the fusion site range was deemed to be the fusion site bin. bd Copy number was calculated from normalized coverage of adapter-trimmed 10x Genomics linked reads for three regions with variation in the chromatin contacts: b the X chromosome, c the potential M. muntjak haplotype-specific duplication, and d the potential M. muntjak haplotype-specific deletion, with the copy number of M. muntjak in blue and M. reevesi in orange.

References

    1. Wurster DH, Benirschke K. Indian muntjac, Muntiacus muntjak: a deer with a low diploid chromosome number. Science. 1970;168:1364–1366. - PubMed
    1. Wurster DH, Benirschke K. Chromosome studies in some deer, the springbok, and the pronghorn, with notes on placentation in deer. Cytologia. 1967;32:273–285. - PubMed
    1. Chi J, et al. New insights into the karyotypic relationships of Chinese muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi), forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii) and gayal (Bos frontalis) Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2005;108:310–316. - PubMed
    1. Hsu TC, Pathak S, Chen TR. The possibility of latent centromeres and a proposed nomenclature system for total chromosome and whole arm translocations. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1975;15:41–49. - PubMed
    1. Liming S, Yingying Y, Xingsheng D. Comparative cytogenetic studies on the red muntjac, Chinese muntjac, and their F1 hybrids. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 1980;26:22–27. - PubMed

Publication types