Physiological Response Differences between Run and Cycle High Intensity Interval Training Program in Recreational Middle Age Female Runners
- PMID: 32874103
- PMCID: PMC7429439
Physiological Response Differences between Run and Cycle High Intensity Interval Training Program in Recreational Middle Age Female Runners
Abstract
The aim of this investigation was to compare the changes in endurance running performance and physiological variables after a four-week period of high intensity interval training (HIIT) in either running or cycling in female athletes. Fourteen recreational female runners (age = 42 10 yr, height = 1.67 0.06 m, body mass = 61.6 10.4 kg, body mass index (BMI) = 22.2 3.4 kg.m-2) were randomly allocated to one of two HIIT training groups: running (HIITrun) or cycling (HIITbike). Each group performed two HIIT sessions per week for 4 weeks, which consisted of 6 x 2 min at 95% of maximal heart rate (HRmax) and 4 x 1 min all out efforts. Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) in treadmill running increased significantly after the HIITrun (p < 0.01, ES = 0.6) but remained unchanged in HIITbike. However, HIITbike improved average velocity in a 10 km running time trial (TTrun) (p < 0.05, ES = -0.4), whereas, no changes were found for the HIITrun group. Analysing the first and last HIIT sessions, for HIITrun only the average rate of perceived exertion (RPEav) increased significantly, whereas, performance variables such as average heart rate (HRav) and average pace (paceav) remained unchanged. HIITbike enhanced significantly the average speed of HIIT sets (speedav) and the peak power output (PPO) of the session, as well as, the RPEav and delayed onset muscle soreness immediately after HIIT session (DOMSpost) were increased significantly. A regime of HIIT in cycling may evoke increases in female recreational runners' power, which may be related with improvements in a 10 km TTrun independent of changes in aerobic capacity. This may be advantageous in order to avoid overuse running related injuries.
Keywords: aerobic capacity; endurance; gender; intermittent training; muscle damage.
© Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.
Figures
References
-
- Bangsbo J., Gunnarsson T.P., Wendell J., Nybo L., Thomassen M. (2009) Reduced volume and increased training intensity elevate muscle Na+-K+ pump α2-subunit expression as well as short-and long-term work capacity in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology 107, 1771-1780. - PubMed
-
- Basset F.A., Boulay M.R. (2000) Specificity of treadmill and cycle ergometer tests in triathletes, runners and cyclists. European Journal of Applied Physiology 81, 214-221. - PubMed
-
- Billat V., Slawinksi J., Bocquet V., Chassaing P., Demarle A., Koralsztein J. (2001) Very Short (15 s-15 s) Interval-Training Around the Critical Velocity Allows Middle-Aged Runners to Maintain VO2 max for 14 minutes. International Journal of Sports Medicine 22, 201-208. - PubMed
-
- Billat V.L., Flechet B., Petit B., Muriaux G., Koralsztein J.-p. (1999) Interval training at VO2max: effects on aerobic performance and overtraining markers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 31, 156-163. - PubMed
-
- Bogdanis G.C., Nevill M.E., Boobis L.H., Lakomy H. (1996) Contribution of phosphocreatine and aerobic metabolism to energy supply during repeated sprint exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology 80, 876-884. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources