Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Re-evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives

EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provided a scientific opinion re-evaluating the safety of Sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives. The Scientific Committee for Food (SCF) assigned these food additives together with other aluminium-containing food additives a provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) of 7 mg aluminium/kg body weight (bw). In 2008, EFSA established a tolerable weekly intake (TWI) of 1 mg aluminium/kg bw per week. Sodium aluminium silicate was shown in rats to be absorbed to a limited extent at 0.12 ± 0.011%. The Panel considered that potassium aluminium silicate would be absorbed and become systemically available similarly to sodium aluminium silicate. No information on the physicochemical characterisation of sodium aluminium silicate and potassium aluminium silicate when used as food additives has been submitted and only very limited toxicological data were available for sodium aluminium silicate. Exposure to E 554 was calculated based on the reported use levels in food supplements. Exposure to aluminium from this use of E 554 was calculated to exceed the TWI for aluminium. Based on the data provided by interested business operators, the Panel considered that E 555 is not being used as a carrier, but as an inseparable component of 'potassium aluminium silicate-based pearlescent pigments'. The Panel calculated the regulatory maximum exposure to E 555 as a carrier for titanium dioxide (E 171) and iron oxides and hydroxides (E 172). Exposure to aluminium from this single use at the maximum permitted level could theoretically far exceed the TWI. Considering that only very limited toxicological data and insufficient information on the physicochemical characterisation of both food additives were available, the Panel concluded that the safety of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) could not be assessed.

Keywords: E 554; E 555; pearlescent pigments; potassium aluminium silicate; sodium aluminium silicate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2005. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to a harmonised approach for risk assessment of substances which are both genotoxic and carcinogenic. EFSA Journal 2005;3(10):282, 31 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2005.282 - DOI
    1. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2008. Safety of aluminium from dietary intake. EFSA Journal 2008;6(7):754, 34 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.754 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2011. Statement of EFSA on the evaluation of a new study related to the bioavailability of aluminium in food. EFSA Journal 2011;9(5):2157. 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2157 - DOI
    1. EFSA ANS Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food), 2012. Guidance for submission for food additive evaluations. EFSA Journal 2012;10(7):2760. 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2760 - DOI
    1. EFSA ANS Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food), 2015. Scientific Opinion on the re‐evaluation of iron oxides and hydroxides (E 172) as food additives. EFSA Journal 2015;13(12):4317, 57 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4317 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources