Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;11(5):686-689.
doi: 10.1177/2192568220920564. Epub 2020 May 7.

Selective Fusion in Lenke 1 B/C: Before or After Menarche?

Affiliations

Selective Fusion in Lenke 1 B/C: Before or After Menarche?

Nestor Ricardo Davies et al. Global Spine J. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Study design: A retrospective, comparative study.

Objective: To determine the radiological behavior of the lumbar curve in selective fusions in premenarchal girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (Lenke 1 B/C).

Methods: A retrospective, comparative study was conducted. Selective fusion was performed in 21 patients younger than 18 years. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group A, after menarche (n = 12) and group B, before menarche (n = 9). Angles (preoperative, and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively) of the fused thoracic curves and the corresponding lumbar curves were measured and compared. For statistical analysis, the t test was used with a significance level of P < .05.

Results: Mean preoperative angle value of the proximal/main thoracic curve was 61° in group A and 57° in group B (P = .44), and 21° and 20°, respectively, in the first year postoperatively (P = .61). Mean preoperative angle value of the lumbar curve was 43° in group A and 42° in group B (P = .87), while at 1 year after surgery, this curve was 19° in both groups (P = 0.91), and at 2 years postoperatively, the curve was 16° in group A and 17° in group B (P = .75).

Conclusions: Over a 2-year follow-up, we did not find significant radiological differences in lumbar curves between patients who underwent surgery before and after menarche.

Keywords: adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; lumbar curve; menarche.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Lumbar curve evolution. Abbreviations: °, degrees; immediate postop, immediate postoperative; 1st year postoperative, first year postoperative; 2nd year postoperative, second year postoperative.

References

    1. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:69–81. - PubMed
    1. Newton PO, Faro FD, Lenke LG, et al. Factors involved in the decision to perform a selective versus nonselective fusion of Lenke 1B and 1C (King-Moe II) curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:S217–S223. - PubMed
    1. Sanders JO, Browne RH, McConnell SJ, Margraf SA, Cooney TE, Finegold DN. Maturity assessment and curve progression in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:64–73. - PubMed
    1. Telang SS, Suh SW, Song HR, Vaidya SV. A large adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curve in a skeletally immature patient: is early surgery the correct approach? Overview of available evidence J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19:534–540. - PubMed
    1. Liljenqvist U, Halm H, Bullmann V. Spontaneous lumbar curve correction in selective anterior instrumentation and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis of Lenke type C. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(suppl 2):S138–S148. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources